Literature DB >> 6486591

Marked disparity between trabecular and cortical bone loss with age in healthy men. Measurement by vertebral computed tomography and radial photon absorptiometry.

D E Meier, E S Orwoll, J M Jones.   

Abstract

To define age-related changes in bone mineral content in normal men, we measured radial (proximal and distal) and vertebral bone mineral content in 62 men aged 30 to 92 years. Radial bone mineral content (largely cortical bone) was measured by single photon absorptiometry, and trabecular vertebral content (T12, L1 to L3) by computed tomography. Radial bone mineral content fell gradually (2% to 3.4% per decade) with age, but vertebral trabecular content fell more rapidly (12% per decade). Body size was not associated with the rate of bone loss from the distal radial and vertebral sites, but men with lower surface areas lost bone more rapidly at the predominantly cortical proximal radial site. The fact that radial cortical bone mineral content falls much less rapidly than vertebral trabecular content with age and is also associated with surface area indicates that trabecular and cortical bone compartments may be independently modulated. Age-related bone loss should not be considered a homogeneous process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6486591     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  35 in total

1.  The assembly of the adult skeleton during growth and maturation: implications for senile osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; S Khosla; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Height loss predicts subsequent hip fracture in men and women of the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Marian T Hannan; Kerry E Broe; L Adrienne Cupples; Alyssa B Dufour; Margo Rockwell; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Bone mass and mineral metabolism in Klinefelter's syndrome.

Authors:  G Luisetto; I Mastrogiacomo; G Bonanni; G Pozzan; S Botteon; L Tizian; P Galuppo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The peak bone mass concept.

Authors:  P Burckhardt; C Michel
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Longitudinal changes in bone mass after one year as measured by different techniques in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  S M Ott; R F Kilcoyne; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Assessment of determinants for osteoporosis in elderly men.

Authors:  S Scholtissen; F Guillemin; O Bruyère; J Collette; B Dousset; C Kemmer; S Culot; D Crémer; H Dejardin; G Hubermont; D Lefebvre; V Pascal-Vigneron; G Weryha; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Effects of physical activity, dietary calcium intake and selected lifestyle factors on bone density in young women.

Authors:  R G McCulloch; D A Bailey; C S Houston; B L Dodd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Quantitative computed tomography for measuring bone mineral density in athletes.

Authors:  H Dinç; G Savci; A Demirci; M Y Sadikoğlu; E Tuncel; H Yavuz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Hip fractures in young patients: is this early osteoporosis?

Authors:  S D Boden; P Labropoulos; R Saunders
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  Androgen deficiency and aging in men.

Authors:  R S Swerdloff; C Wang
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.