Literature DB >> 6482418

Breast cancers: estrogen and progesterone receptor status as a predictor of in vitro chemotherapeutic response.

C A Bertelsen, A E Giuliano, D H Kern, B D Mann, D J Roe, D L Morton.   

Abstract

Although clinical observations have shown that estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast tumors are more responsive to hormonal therapy than ER-negative (ER-) tumors, it remains controversial whether ER status can predict chemotherapeutic response. To determine if there was any correlation between estrogen and progesterone values and in vitro chemosensitivity to various anticancer drugs, clonogenic (CA), estrogen (ERA), and progesterone (PRA) assays on breast cancers were performed on 100 patients. Clonogenic assays were performed using the double-layer soft agar technique with continuous drug exposures. ERAs and PRAs were performed using the charcoal-coated dextran method. Chemosensitivity was defined as 50% inhibition of colony formation. ERA was considered positive if greater than or equal to 5 fmole/mg cytosol and PRA positive if greater than or equal to 10 fmole/mg cytosol. Significant tumor growth (greater than 30 colonies/plate) was achieved in 81/100 assays. ERA and PRA values were not predictive of colony formation in vitro. Of all agents or combinations of agents tested (L-PAM, 5-FU, MTX, adriamycin, vinblastine, cis-plat, FAC, CMF), only the response to 5-FU correlated significantly with ERA. Eight of 11 (73%) of the ER- tumors were sensitive to 5-FU, whereas only 6/20 (30%) of ER+ tumors were sensitive (P less than 0.05). ER- tumors were also more likely to be sensitive to CMF (P = 0.09) and adriamycin (P = 0.07) than ER+ tumors. PRA values were not predictive of chemosensitivity, nor did combining PRA and ERA enhance the predictive value of ERA alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6482418     DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(84)90186-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  3 in total

1.  Targeted functional imaging of estrogen receptors with 99mTc-GAP-EDL.

Authors:  Nobukazu Takahashi; David J Yang; Saady Kohanim; Chang-Sok Oh; Dong-Fang Yu; Ali Azhdarinia; Hiroaki Kurihara; Xiaochun Zhang; Joe Y Chang; E Edmund Kim
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  High-grade breast cancers include both highly sensitive and highly resistant subsets to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tomo Osako; Rie Horii; Masaaki Matsuura; Kaoru Domoto; Yoshimi Ide; Yumi Miyagi; Shunji Takahashi; Yoshinori Ito; Takuji Iwase; Futoshi Akiyama
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Prognostic value of estrogen receptors determined by radiochemical vs. histochemical methods in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Sismondi; V Aimone; F Genta; G Voglino; F Deltetto; G Giardina; G Botta; B Ghiringhello; M P Mano; P Zola
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.