Literature DB >> 20143238

High-grade breast cancers include both highly sensitive and highly resistant subsets to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Tomo Osako1, Rie Horii, Masaaki Matsuura, Kaoru Domoto, Yoshimi Ide, Yumi Miyagi, Shunji Takahashi, Yoshinori Ito, Takuji Iwase, Futoshi Akiyama.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We reported that breast cancers achieving pathological complete response (pCR) or progressive disease (PD) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which are considered exact opposites on the chemosensitivity spectrum, have certain clinicopathological features in common. To determine the highly sensitive and highly resistant subsets to cytotoxic chemotherapy, we evaluated predictive factors for pCR and PD to NAC, and assessed the similarities in these factors.
METHODS: Subjects comprised 300 women with 304 stage II or III breast cancers treated with chemotherapy that was anthracycline-based, taxane, or both, followed by surgery between 2007 and 2008. We retrospectively evaluated pre-NAC clinicopathological features including chemotherapy regimen, clinical T stage, nuclear grade (NG), hormone receptor (HR) status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status in pCR and PD, using univariate chi(2) testing and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Of 304 tumors, 30 (10%) achieved pCR and 22 (7%) showed PD to NAC. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anthracycline plus taxane chemotherapy (P = 0.006), NG3 (P = 0.006), HR-negativity (P = 0.013), and HER2-positivity (P = 0.010) were significant predictors of pCR, and T3-4 (P = 0.002) and NG3 (P = 0.010) were significant predictors of PD.
CONCLUSIONS: High-grade breast cancers include both highly sensitive and highly resistant subsets to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Three factors can help discriminate between these subsets. HR-negative and HER2-positive can be predictive of high chemosensitivity. Advanced primary tumor stage can be predictive of high chemoresistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20143238     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-010-0798-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  36 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth.

Authors:  L Norton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Predictive biological markers for response of invasive breast cancer to anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based primary (radio-)chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hans-Bernd Prisack; Christiaan Karreman; Olga Modlich; Werner Audretsch; Mahmoud Danae; Mahadi Rezai; Hans Bojar
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  B A Gusterson; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; K N Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; C M Rudenstam; R Golouh; R Reed
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Breast cancers: estrogen and progesterone receptor status as a predictor of in vitro chemotherapeutic response.

Authors:  C A Bertelsen; A E Giuliano; D H Kern; B D Mann; D J Roe; D L Morton
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  HER2 expression and efficacy of preoperative paclitaxel/FAC chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice Andre; Chafika Mazouni; Cornelia Liedtke; Shu-Wan Kau; Debby Frye; Marjorie Green; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; W Fraser Symmans; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Assessment of histologic features and expression of biomarkers in predicting pathologic response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianzhou Wang; Thomas A Buchholz; Lavinia P Middleton; D Craig Allred; Susan L Tucker; Henry M Kuerer; Francisco J Esteva; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Aysegul A Sahin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Her-2/neu gene amplification and response to paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Gottfried E Konecny; Christoph Thomssen; Hans Joachim Lück; Michael Untch; He-Jing Wang; Walter Kuhn; Holger Eidtmann; Andreas du Bois; Sigrid Olbricht; Dieter Steinfeld; Volker Möbus; Gunter von Minckwitz; Suganda Dandekar; Lillian Ramos; Giovanni Pauletti; Mark D Pegram; Fritz Jänicke; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  P Chollet; S Amat; H Cure; M de Latour; G Le Bouedec; M-A Mouret-Reynier; J-P Ferriere; J-L Achard; J Dauplat; F Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reinventing diagnostics for personalized therapy in oncology.

Authors:  Diponkar Banerjee
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.