Literature DB >> 6482019

Evaluation of the TNM classification of stomach cancer and proposal for its rational stage-grouping.

K Miwa.   

Abstract

The present TNM Classification with the provisional stage-grouping for stomach cancer, which was adopted in 1978, was evaluated for compatibility in respect to survival by using 15,589 stomach cancer patients registered in Japan from 1969 to 1973. Adequacy and usefulness were shown in all categories of T, N, M, pT and pN, individually. Important irrationality in accordance with the TNM General Rules was recognized in both the provisional TNM and p.TNM stage-groupings. More adequate stage-grouping was searched for and is discussed according to the results of statistical analysis of the patients' survival and the principle of the TNM General Rules. New TNM and p.TNM stage-groupings were proposed as the best ones at present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6482019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

1.  Morphological predictors of survival in early and advanced gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  P Schmitz-Moormann; P Hermanek; G W Himmelmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Prognostic value of platelet-derived growth factor-A (PDGF-A) in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M Katano; M Nakamura; K Fujimoto; K Miyazaki; T Morisaki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Preoperative serum immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP) test for the prognosis of gastric cancer: a statistical study of the threshold level and evaluation of the effect of the biological response modifier PSK.

Authors:  J Sakamoto; A Koike; S Saji; S Teramukai; Y Ohashi; H Nakazato
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Evaluation of a new staging system by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  T Ochiai; H Hayashi; T Suzuki; K Nakajima; H Shimada; E Hishikawa; A Yasumoto; A Takeda; K Isono
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Changing pattern of gastric cancer in Oxfordshire.

Authors:  E Rios-Castellanos; F Sitas; N A Shepherd; D P Jewell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Loss of Ep-CAM (CO17-1A) expression predicts survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  I Songun; S V Litvinov; C J H van de Velde; S T Pals; J Hermans; J H J M van Krieken
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Tumour angiogenesis and tumour cell proliferation as prognostic indicators in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  K Maeda; Y S Chung; S Takatsuka; Y Ogawa; N Onoda; T Sawada; Y Kato; A Nitta; Y Arimoto; Y Kondo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The prognostic significance of the accumulation of p53 tumour-suppressor gene protein in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  B V Joypaul; D Hopwood; E L Newman; S Qureshi; A Grant; S A Ogston; D P Lane; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.