Literature DB >> 6478193

Some neurolinguistic implications of prearticulatory editing in production.

S M Garnsey, G S Dell.   

Abstract

This paper argues that a complete model of language production must include a prearticulatory editing component. The function of this component is to monitor planned speech for deviations from the speaker's intention and repair any deviations that are found. It is claimed that adding such an editing component onto a production model fundamentally changes any account of aphasic symptoms using that model. As a case in point it is shown that E. M. Saffran's (1982, British Journal of Psychology, 73, 317-337) argument that agrammatic Broca's aphasia involves a deficit at the functional level of M. F. Garrett's (1975, in G. H. Bower (Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation, New York: Academic Press) production model is no longer sound when prearticulatory editing processes are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6478193     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring.

Authors:  C C Oomen; A Postma
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-03

2.  Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing.

Authors:  R F West; K E Stanovich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-03

3.  Motor movement matters: the flexible abstractness of inner speech.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

4.  Detecting self-produced speech errors before and after articulation: an ERP investigation.

Authors:  Kevin M Trewartha; Natalie A Phillips
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.