Literature DB >> 6474400

Switching to low tar cigarettes: are the tar league tables relevant?

R G Rawbone.   

Abstract

Representative samples of smokers of regular middle tar and regular low tar cigarettes responded to a questionnaire concerning their smoking habits and participated in a blind product test, returning 24 hour butt collections from the smoking of both middle tar and low tar cigarettes. An estimate of the mouth intake of tar derived from a measurement of filter nicotine confirmed partial compensation by the low tar smokers relative to the middle tar smokers, resulting in 32% lower tar delivery rather than the 46% expected from the standard machine values. Most middle tar smokers (98%) achieved an estimated tar delivery within or below that of the league table middle tar band when smoking middle tar cigarettes, while 70% of low tar smokers had a mouth intake of 10 X 49 mg or below within the low tar band when smoking low tar cigarettes. These results support the current tar league tables as a guide to the smoker in selecting a lower delivery cigarette.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6474400      PMCID: PMC459894          DOI: 10.1136/thx.39.9.657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  11 in total

1.  Estimating the yield to smokers of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide from the 'lowest yield' ventilated filter-cigarettes.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; W S Rickert; M A Pope; J C Robinson; R C Frecker
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1982-06

2.  Would a medium-nicotine, low-tar cigarette be less hazardous to health?

Authors:  R Stepney
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-11-14

3.  When low tar cigarettes yield high tar: cigarette filter ventilation hole blocking and its detection.

Authors:  T Lombardo; C J Davis; D M Prue
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Does cigarette nicotine yield affect puff volume?

Authors:  S W Gust; R W Pickens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Monitoring smoking patterns of low and high tar cigarettes with inductive plethysmography.

Authors:  M J Tobin; M A Sackner
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1982-08

6.  Tar and nicotine delivery of cigarettes. What a difference a puff makes.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The misuse of 'less-hazardous' cigarettes and its detection: hole-blocking of ventilated filters.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; V Khouw; M A Pope
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Self-titration by cigarette smokers.

Authors:  H Ashton; R Stepney; J W Thompson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-08-11

9.  Relation of nicotine yield of cigarettes to blood nicotine concentrations in smokers.

Authors:  M A Russell; M Jarvis; R Iyer; C Feyerabend
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-04-05

10.  Changes in the cigarette consumption of smokers in relation to changes in tar/nicotine content of cigarettes smoked.

Authors:  L Garfinkel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  3 in total

1.  Low tar means less tar.

Authors:  R G Rawbone
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Reduction of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide intake in low tar smokers.

Authors:  M A Russell; M J Jarvis; C Feyerabend; Y Saloojee
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  New therapeutic options for persistent low-level viremia in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Increase of entecavir dosage.

Authors:  Guo-Qing Yin; Jun Li; Bei Zhong; Yong-Fong Yang; Mao-Rong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.