Literature DB >> 6472108

Judging response-outcome relations: the role of response-outcome contingency, outcome probability, and method of information presentation.

E A Wasserman, H Shaklee.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6472108     DOI： 10.3758/bf03197676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN： 0090-502X


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; W C WARD
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1965

2.  Effects of experience on perception of causality.

Authors:  H E GRUBER; C D FINK; V DAMM
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-02

3.  Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations.

Authors:  L J Chapman; J P Chapman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1967-06

4.  Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.

Authors:  L J Chapman; J P Chapman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1969-06

5.  The display of information and the judgment of contingency.

Authors:  W C Ward; H M Jenkins
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1965-09

6.  A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events.

Authors:  H Shaklee; D Tucker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-09

7.  Perceptual quantification of conditional dependency.

Authors:  D E Erlick; R G Mills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-01

8.  Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?

Authors:  L B Alloy; L Y Abramson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1979-12
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning.

Authors:  Birgit Elsner; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-18

2.  On the origin of personal causal theories.

Authors:  M E Young
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.