Literature DB >> 646980

Variation in latency times of visually evoked cortical potentials.

G H Van Lith, G W Van Marle, T M Van Dok-Mak.   

Abstract

Latency times of visually evoked cortical potentials stimulated by reversal of a slow checkerboard pattern are highly dependent on the time needed to accomplish the reversal movement. If, owing to the method, the pattern reversal time is not kept stable, variability of the latency times is unnecessarily high for clinical purposes. This may be the case when television equipment is used.

Mesh：

Year:  1978        PMID： 646980      PMCID： PMC1043192          DOI： 10.1136/bjo.62.4.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Asselman; D W Chadwick; D C Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

4.  Cerebral potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry.

Authors:  W A Cobb; H B Morton; G Ettlinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962
  4 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiological evaluation of the macular cone adaptation: VEP after photostress. A review.

Authors:  V Parisi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pattern and flash visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Neetens; Y Hendrata; J van Rompaey
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1979-03-22       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  A personal computer-based visual evoked potential stimulus and recording system.

Authors:  M S Bradnam; A L Evans; D M Montgomery; D Keating; B E Damato; A Cluckie; D Allan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Reproducibility of the visual evoked potential using a light-emitting diode stimulator.

Authors:  N F Skuse; D Burke; B McKeon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Pattern evoked cortical potentials and compressive lesions along the visual pathways.

Authors:  G H van Lith; S Vijfvinkel-Bruinenga; H Graniewski-Wijnands
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Two disadvantages of a television system as pattern stimulator for evoked potentials.

Authors:  G H van Lith; G W van Marle; S Vijfvinkel-Bruinenga
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-04-15       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Value of pattern evoked cortical potentials for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G H van Lith; A G van Vliet; G T van Dok-Mak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-03-15       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Interference of 50 Hz electrical cortical potentials evoked by TV systems.

Authors:  G H van Lith; G W van Marle; S Vijfvinkel-Bruinenga
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.638
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.