Literature DB >> 6464363

Structural modeling of spatial vision.

R Sekuler, H R Wilson, C Owsley.   

Abstract

A linear structural model of mechanisms underlying spatial vision was generated from the variance-covariance matrix of contrast sensitivity data. The data had been collected on a large group of observers ranging in age from 19 to 87 yr, using gratings of 0.5-16 c/deg spatial frequency. Structural models incorporating various numbers of spatial frequency-tuned mechanisms were compared, with a three-mechanism model giving the best account of the data. The same analysis was applied to contrast sensitivity data simulated from Wilson and Bergen's (1979) model. When the stimulated data covered 0.5-16 c/deg, only three mechanisms were needed to give a satisfactory account of the data; when the simulated data covered 0.25-16 c/deg, four mechanisms were required. Peak sensitivities and bandwidths of the mechanisms extracted from the simulated data resembled those extracted from the real, population data. This reinforces the idea that at an early stage of human vision a small number of spatially-tuned mechanisms are operative. In addition, the outcome of analyses with both real and simulated data illustrate the potential value of linear structural models for vision research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6464363     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90210-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

2.  Evidence of spatial and temporal channels in the correlational structure of human spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  V A Billock; T H Harding
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Individual differences in visual science: What can be learned and what is good experimental practice?

Authors:  John D Mollon; Jenny M Bosten; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Variations in normal color vision. VI. Factors underlying individual differences in hue scaling and their implications for models of color appearance.

Authors:  Kara J Emery; Vicki J Volbrecht; David H Peterzell; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  How arousal modulates the visual contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Jongsoo Baek; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-06-16

6.  Characterization of Spatial Frequency Channels Underlying Disparity Sensitivity by Factor Analysis of Population Data.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Reduced surround suppression in monocular motion perception.

Authors:  Sandra Arranz-Paraíso; Jenny C A Read; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.