Literature DB >> 6455967

Pharmacokinetics of moxalactam in subjects with normal and impaired renal function.

A Leroy, G Humbert, J P Fillastre.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of moxalactam were investigated in five subjects with normal renal function and 21 uremic patients. Normal subjects were given intravenous doses of 7.5 and 15 mg of the drug per kg as bolus injections (1 min) and 30 mg of the drug per kg as a 20-min infusion. Pharmacokinetic data, calculated by using a two-compartment open body model, were similar for the three intravenous doses: the t 1/2 alpha value was within 0.12 to 0.20 h, the t 1/2 beta value was 1.98 to 2.05 h, the central distribution volume (Vc) was 3.81 to 7.04 liters/1.73 m2, and the apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was 9.12 to 13.36 liters/1.73 m2, i.e., 13.7 to 20.2% of the body weight. From 82.0 to 97.7% of the dose was recovered, in unchanged form, in urine during 24 h. After a single intramuscular dose of 15 mg/kg in the same subjects with normal renal function, the mean peak serum levels, occurring at 0.95 +/- 0.37 h, were 48.28 +/- 11.81 microgram/ml, the t 1/2 beta value was 2.22 +/- 0.16 h, the renal clearance (CR) was 87.5 +/- 9.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and 96.9 +/- 12.7% of the injected dose was found in 24-h urine. Pharmacokinetic data were similar for the two routes of administration. In uremic patients, the t 1/2 beta increased according to the severity of renal failure; it was 4.83 h in patients with creatinine clearances (Ccr) within 30 to 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 8.42 h for Ccr values within 10 to 30 ml/min, and 18.95 h in hemodialysis patients. During a 4- to 6-h dialysis session, the t 1/2 beta value was 3.65 h and 51% of the drug was removed by dialysis. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state increased in patients with Ccr values below 10 ml/min; serum and renal clearances decreased in uremic patients, and the nonrenal clearances remained constant in all these patients. From these pharmacokinetic results, linear relationships were found between the kinetic data and the biological parameters of the glomerular filtration rate. Dosage schedules were established, adapted to the degree of renal impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6455967      PMCID: PMC181593          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.19.6.965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  14 in total

1.  [Practical modifications concerning the determination of antibiotics in clinical practice].

Authors:  Y CHABBERT; H BOULINGRE
Journal:  Rev Fr Etud Clin Biol       Date:  1957-06

2.  Assessment of pharmacokinetic constants from postinfusion blood curves obtained after I.V. infusion.

Authors:  J C Loo; S Riegelman
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Plasma protein binding and distribution characteristics of drugs as indices of their hemodialyzability.

Authors:  P R Gwilt; D Perrier
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  The pharmacokinetics of LY127935, a broad spectrum oxa-beta-lactam.

Authors:  R Wise; S Baker; N Wright; R Livingston
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Pharmacology of a new 1-oxa-beta-lactam (LY127935) in normal volunteers.

Authors:  J N Parsons; J M Romano; M E Levison
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam (LY127935), azlocillin, mezlocillin, and other beta-lactam antibiotics against Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains.

Authors:  C N Baker; C Thornsberry; R N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antibacterial activity of a new 1-oxa cephalosporin compared with that of other beta-lactam compounds.

Authors:  H C Neu; N Aswapokee; K P Fu; P Aswapokee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative in vitro activity of 1-oxa-beta-lactam (LY127935) and cefoperazone with other beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  M V Borobio; J Aznar; R Jimenez; F Garcia; E J Perea
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  LY127935, a new beta-lactam antibiotic, versus Proteus, Klebsiella, Serratia, and Pseudomonas.

Authors:  D J Flournoy; F A Perryman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In vitro activity of LY127935.

Authors:  M Barza; F P Tally; N V Jacobus; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  16 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic properties of the newer cephalosporins. A valid basis for drug selection?

Authors:  J T Noble; M Barza
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  In vitro susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates to cefotaxime, moxalactam, and cefoperazone.

Authors:  R A Greenfield; T A Kurzynski; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam.

Authors:  B Kemmerich; H Lode; G Belmega; T Jendroschek; K Borner; P Koeppe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Moxalactam kinetics during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis after intraperitoneal administration.

Authors:  T E Jones; R W Milne; Y Mudaliar; L N Sansom
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Considerations in dosage selection for third generation cephalosporins.

Authors:  J H Yuk-Choi; C H Nightingale; T W Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  W L St Peter; K A Redic-Kill; C E Halstenson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetics of moxalactam in elderly subjects.

Authors:  M H Andritz; R P Smith; A L Baltch; P E Griffin; J V Conroy; N Sutphen; M C Hammer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intraperitoneal moxalactam in chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  H Albin; J M Ragnaud; F Demotes-Mainard; G Vincon; C Wone
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Steady-state moxalactam pharmacokinetics in patients: noncompartmental versus two-compartmental analysis.

Authors:  D J Swanson; D P Reitberg; I L Smith; P B Wels; J J Schentag
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1983-08

Review 10.  Drug therapy in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  C S Lee; T C Marbury
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.