Literature DB >> 6447775

Gastroschisis: primary closure or Silon pouch.

S H Ein, S Z Rubin.   

Abstract

There has been a substantial increase in the incidence of gastroschisis in the last few years, and total parenteral nutrition has enabled many of these neonates to survive the long post-operative course. From 1969 to 1976 inclusive, 44 neonates with gastroschisis were treated with either primary closure or the application of a Silon pouch. Fifteen neonates were managed by primary closure. Three of these neonates developed clinical sepsis, but no other intraabdominal complications ensued. There were two deaths (13%) in the early postoperative period, due to CNS hemorrhage and aspiration. This gorup of 15 babies had 17 abdominal operations and the survivors averaged 32 days of parenteral intravenous nutrition before complete oral alimentation could be successfully started. Two ventral hernias required late repair. Twenty-nine neonates were managed primarily with a Silon pouch. Eighteen of these newborns developed sepsis, three Silon sacs had to be removed because of necrotic bowel within, and two other infants developed small bowel fistulae. There were 12 deaths (35%). These 12 infants had prolonged intestinal malfunction that lasted an average of 67 days. This group of 29 babies had 64 abdominal operations and the survivors averaged 46 days of parenteral intravenous nutrition prior to full oral feeds. Four ventral hernias required later repair. The comparison of results in these two groups of newborns reveals a striking difference in their post-operative course and survival. Although the Silon sac has until now become the accepted surgical procedure for gastroschisis, these results conclusively indicate the advantage of primary reduction and closure of the abdominal wall defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6447775     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(80)80771-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  10 in total

1.  Gastroschisis: determinants of neonatal outcome.

Authors:  S J Singh; A Fraser; J F Leditschke; K Spence; R Kimble; J Dalby-Payne; S Baskaranathan; P Barr; R Halliday; N Badawi; J K Peat; M Glasson; D Cass
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  An easy method for adjusting a silo for delayed closure of gastroschisis.

Authors:  L J Huskisson; V M Wright
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  The pivotal role of the surgeon in the results achieved in gastroschisis.

Authors:  M R Davies; P G Beale
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Is specialist centre delivery of gastroschisis beneficial?

Authors:  G Nicholls; V Upadhyaya; P Gornall; R G Buick; J J Corkery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Gastroschisis and ruptured omphalocele.

Authors:  J F Densler
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Gastroschisis: can the morbidity be avoided?

Authors:  R T Blakelock; J E Harding; A Kolbe; P W Pease
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Selective management of gastroschisis.

Authors:  K R Swartz; M W Harrison; J R Campbell; T J Campbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Controversies in the management of gastroschisis: a study of 40 patients.

Authors:  M D Stringer; R J Brereton; V M Wright
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Evolution of staged versus primary closure of gastroschisis.

Authors:  Joseph N Kidd; Richard J Jackson; Samuel D Smith; Charles W Wagner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Gastroschisis--primary fascial closure. The goal for optimal management.

Authors:  H C Filston
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.