Literature DB >> 24057522

The pivotal role of the surgeon in the results achieved in gastroschisis.

M R Davies1, P G Beale.   

Abstract

A single neonatal surgical unit treated 42 cases of gastroschisis over a 12-year period (1981-1993). The surgical management of each case was individualised, but every attempt was made to perform a primary repair when possible, based on the premise that this strategy gave the best outcome. The eviscerated intestine was evaluated with the patient under general anaesthesia. Serosal peel was not removed and intestinal atresias were not repaired. Gangrenous intestine was resected. The contents of the bowel were emptied proximally via a large naso-gastric tube and distally via the anus with warm saline lavage. The anterior abdominal wall was stretched and then reduction of the prolapse attempted. Following maximal enlargement of the peritoneal cavity, it was left to the operator to decide whether primary repair was possible and, indeed, permissible in each instance. Staged repairs necessitated the use of silastic pouches. Respiratory and intestinal insufficiency were managed by intermittent positive-pressure ventilation and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Over one-half of the cases (24 of 42) were under 2.5 kg at birth. Intra-uterine growth retardation was unusual. Ten babies were delivered for obstetrical indications by Caesarean section: 50% were pre-term and in 4 pre-natal diagnosis of a ventral abdominal wall anomaly had been made. The transmural defects were all sited at the umbilicus and were to the right of a consolidated cord in 41 instances. Midgut necrosis due to torsion was encountered in 1 case; 3 further cases with intestinal atresia occurred. Primary closure was obtained in 30 (71%) of the cases reviewed. A prosthetic pouch was used in 12 patients for on everage 10 days in 10 uncomplicated cases. The average length of time in days of tertiary care given to 25 uncomplicated cases treated by primary fascial closure was: ventilatory support 4; intensive care treatment 8; and nutritional source TPN 20. There were 5 deaths (12%): 1 was unpreventable due to prenatal intestinal infarction; 2 were due to abdominal compartment syndrome with renal failure, and, intestinal ischaemia complicating primary and planned staged repairs; 1 caused by intestinal infarction due to torsion of bowel in a pouch; and 1 due to invasive infection. The role played by the strategy taken by the surgeon in the management of gastroschisis is crucial to the outcome. The creation of a compartment-like syndrome produced uncorrectable complications in this series of cases in both primary and staged abdominal wall closures. Minor degrees of this complication proved to be reversible in some patients, which was the reason for the wait-and-see attitude adopted in the management of this problem, often with fatal outcome. Where intra-peritoneal pressure monitoring is not used, the operating surgeon relies on unscientific observations for decision-making at the operating table. The time from birth to operation in 25 of the reviewed cases was on average 5 1/2 h. Of this group, 20 were outborn babies. This is unsatisfactory, but as shown by this review, even in the absence of prenatal management, which should ensure prompt repair, satisfactory results are still possible.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24057522     DOI: 10.1007/BF00183731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  38 in total

1.  A new method for surgical treatment of large omphaloceles.

Authors:  R E GROSS
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1948-08       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Repair of gastroschisis with preservation of the umbilicus.

Authors:  K C Tan; E R Howard
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Gastroschisis: primary closure or Silon pouch.

Authors:  S H Ein; S Z Rubin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  The effect of mode of delivery on the perinatal outcome in fetuses with abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  M Moretti; A Khoury; J Rodriquez; T Lobe; D Shaver; B Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Preservation of the umbilical cord at the primary fascial closure in infants with gastroschisis.

Authors:  M Nagaya; H Ando; M Tsuda; K Hiraiwa; H Akatsuka
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Selective management of gastroschisis.

Authors:  K R Swartz; M W Harrison; J R Campbell; T J Campbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Improved neonatal survival through maternal transport.

Authors:  T R Harris; J Isaman; H R Giles
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Cesarean section does not improve outcome in gastroschisis.

Authors:  C A Bethel; J H Seashore; R J Touloukian
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Ischemic bowel after primary closure for gastroschisis.

Authors:  S H Ein; R Superina; C Bagwell; N Wiseman
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Gastroschisis and intestinal atresia.

Authors:  R Shah; M M Woolley
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of management and outcome of neonatal surgery in Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sebastian O Ekenze; Obinna V Ajuzieogu; Benedict C Nwomeh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Gastroschisis and omphalocele.

Authors:  A Puri; M Bajpai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.