Literature DB >> 6446718

Integration of bacteriophage Mu at host chromosomal replication forks during lytic development.

R A Fitts, A L Taylor.   

Abstract

The target site for bacteriophage Mu integration in a lytic cycle of infection was investigated. DNA synthesis in five Hfr strains of Escherichia coli K-12 was synchronized by amino acid starvation and was allowed to proceed for 0, 8, or 15 min before infection. The Hfr cells were then infected with Mu and were subsequently mated with nonimmune F- recipient cells. Mating was interrupted mechanically at 5-min intervals and samples were assayed for infective centers. Conjugal transfer of Mu was delayed in Hfr strains that have transfer origins 15 map units or more from the E. coli replication origin, and the delays increased as the distance between an Hfr point of origin and the replication origin increased. When a gene A mutant of Mu was used for the infection, no infective centers were generated. Infection with a gene B mutant resulted in infective center formation only after long periods of mating. These data are most consistent with a model in which infecting Mu DNA or its progeny integrate at host chromosomal replication forks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6446718      PMCID: PMC349492          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

Review 1.  Escherichia coli K-12 F-prime factors, old and new.

Authors:  K B Low
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1972-12

Review 2.  Pedigrees of some mutant strains of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  B J Bachmann
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1972-12

3.  Mutations in the lactose operon caused by bacteriophage Mu.

Authors:  E Daniell; R Roberts; J Abelson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1972-08-14       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Mechanism of action of nalidixic acid on conjugating bacteria.

Authors:  N Bouck; E A Adelberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The origin and direction of replication of the chromosome of Escherichia coli B-r.

Authors:  M L Pato; D A Glaser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chromosome replication in some strains of Escherichia coli K12.

Authors:  L G Caro; C M Berg
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1968

7.  Mu-1 promoted integration of a -gal phage in the chromosome of E. coli.

Authors:  M Faelen; A Toussaint; M Couturier
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1971

8.  Rapid mapping of conditional and auxotrophic mutations in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  B Low
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Synchronous reinitiation of chromosome replication in E. coli B-r after nalidixic acid treatment.

Authors:  C B Ward; M W Hane; D A Glaser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Some effects of nalidixic acid on conjugation in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  M W Hane
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  8 in total

1.  Replication forks of Escherichia coli are not the preferred sites for lysogenic integration of bacteriophage Mu.

Authors:  S Sivan; A Zaritsky; V Kagan-Zur
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Conservative integration of bacteriophage Mu DNA into pBR322 plasmid.

Authors:  J C Liebart; P Ghelardini; L Paolozzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The influence of host DNA replication on the formation of infectious and transducing Mu-particles.

Authors:  J Teifel; H Schmieger
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1981

4.  Escherichia coli K-12 gyrB gene product is involved in the lethal effect of the ligts2 mutant of bacteriophage Mu.

Authors:  P Ghelardini; J C Liebart; C Marchelli; A M Pedrini; L Paolozzi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Two classes of Mu lig mutants: the thermosensitives for integration and replication and the hyperproducers for ligase.

Authors:  L Paolozzi; P Ghelardini; J C Liebart; A Capozzoni; C Marchelli
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Host DNA replication forks are not preferred targets for bacteriophage Mu transposition.

Authors:  H Nakai; A L Taylor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Recombination involving transposable elements: role of target molecule replication in Tn1 delta Ap-mediated replicon fusion.

Authors:  C J Muster; J A Shapiro; L A MacHattie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Growth of bacteriophage Mu in Escherichia coli dnaA mutants.

Authors:  D L McBeth; A L Taylor
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.103

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.