Literature DB >> 6216342

Growth of bacteriophage Mu in Escherichia coli dnaA mutants.

D L McBeth, A L Taylor.   

Abstract

In one-step growth experiments we found that bacteriophage Mu grew less efficiently in nonreplicating dnaA mutants than in dnaA+ strains of Escherichia coli. Phage development in dnaA hosts was characterized by latent periods that were 15 to 30 min longer and an average burst size that was reduced by 1.5- to 4-fold. The differences in phage Mu development in dnaA and dnaA+ strains were most pronounced in cells infected at a low multiplicity and became less pronounced in cells infected at a high multiplicity. Many of these differences could be eliminated by allowing the arrested dnaA cells to restart chromosome replication just before infection. In continuous labeling experiments we found that infected dnaA strains incorporated 5 to 40 times more [methyl-3H]thymidine than did uninfected cells, depending on the multiplicity of infection. DNA-DNA hybridization assays showed that greater than 90% of this label was contained in phage Mu DNA sequences and that only small amounts of the label appeared in E. coli sequences. In contrast, substantial amounts of label were incorporated into both host and viral DNA sequences in infected dnaA+ cells. Although our results indicated that phage Mu development is not absolutely dependent on concurrent host chromosomal DNA replication, they did strongly suggest that host replication is necessary for optimal growth of this phage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6216342      PMCID: PMC256299     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  23 in total

1.  Events following prophage Mu induction.

Authors:  T Razzaki; A I Bukhari
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Kinetics of Mu DNA synthesis.

Authors:  C Wijffelman; B Lotterman
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1977-03-07

3.  State of prophage Mu DNA upon induction.

Authors:  E Ljungquist; A I Bukhari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization assay for replication origin deoxyribonucleic acid of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P L Kuempel
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Induction of prophage lambda in a mutant of E. coli K12 defective in initiation of DNA replication at high temperature.

Authors:  M Monk; J Gross
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1971

6.  Level of tryptophan messenger RNA in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J D Stubbs; B D Hall
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1968-10-28       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  DNA synthesis in temperature sensitive mutants of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Kohiyama
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1968

8.  Escherichia coli mutants temperature-sensitive for DNA synthesis.

Authors:  J A Wechsler; J D Gross
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1971

9.  A membrane-filter technique for the detection of complementary DNA.

Authors:  D T Denhardt
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1966-06-13       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Isolation of heterogeneous circular DNA from induced lysogens of bacteriophage Mu-1.

Authors:  B T Waggoner; N S González; A L Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  The phiX174-type primosome promotes replisome assembly at the site of recombination in bacteriophage Mu transposition.

Authors:  J M Jones; H Nakai
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-11-17       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Repair of transposable phage Mu DNA insertions begins only when the E. coli replisome collides with the transpososome.

Authors:  Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Involvement of Escherichia coli K-12 DNA polymerase I in the growth of bacteriophage Mu.

Authors:  D L McBeth; A L Taylor
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Host DNA replication forks are not preferred targets for bacteriophage Mu transposition.

Authors:  H Nakai; A L Taylor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.490

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.