Literature DB >> 6439812

A taxonomy: hospital information systems evaluation methodologies.

J R Krobock.   

Abstract

During the past decade, computers and information systems and their resultant products have pervaded hospitals. Not only have the number of and investments in computers and their associated systems increased, but the types of hospital systems and affected functions have also multiplied. Unfortunately, methodologies to measure impacts of these systems have not evolved at the same pace. There have been few developments of new techniques. Existing techniques have not been adapted for use in hospitals. As a result, evaluations are not performed or are based upon generalizations, often with users minimally involved, if at all. Most techniques emphasize the cost-benefit approach, but this should not be the only tool used. This paper presents a taxonomy of methodologies for the evaluation of hospital information systems. The analyses of methodologies and systems are accomplished from user's perspectives. Effectiveness of system products is emphasized. Users are provided with an additional tool to plan, organize, control, and direct the information resources and achieve the hospital's goals and objectives.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6439812     DOI: 10.1007/bf02285254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  11 in total

1.  A protocol for evaluating hospital information systems.

Authors:  H H Schmitz
Journal:  Hosp Health Serv Adm       Date:  1977

2.  What to expect from electronic data processing in medical centers.

Authors:  G S Whitted
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1978

3.  Too much technology, not enough control.

Authors:  S LaViolette
Journal:  Mod Healthc       Date:  1981-05

4.  A computer is only as good as its managers.

Authors:  A Story; M Dowsett; A Worsley
Journal:  Health Care (Don Mills)       Date:  1981-06

5.  Evaluation of a medical data system.

Authors:  R H Richart
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1970-10-05

6.  Evaluation--a word for all seasons.

Authors:  R R Grams
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Technology evaluation: a case study of MARS (Missouri Automated Radiology System).

Authors:  W L Fairman; E A Dickhaus
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  An evaluation methodology for office practice information systems.

Authors:  M N Hofman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Evaluation methodology for ambulatory care information systems.

Authors:  D W Simborg; Q E Whiting-O'Keefe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Computerized hospital information systems: their future role in medicine.

Authors:  S J Jay; J G Anderson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  1 in total

1.  Initial impact of a clinical laboratory computer system. Themes common to expectations and actualities.

Authors:  B Kaplan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.