Literature DB >> 3668403

Initial impact of a clinical laboratory computer system. Themes common to expectations and actualities.

B Kaplan1.   

Abstract

A longitudinal study is being conducted of a clinical laboratory computer information system's impact. This paper reports on effects that laboratory directors anticipated prior to installation, and effects reported by laboratory technologists 7 months postimplementation. Primary changes caused by the computer system were increases in the amount of paper work performed by technologists, and improvements in laboratory results reporting. The system generally was well accepted, but laboratory technologists differed in their responses to it. Technologists in some laboratories focused on work increases, whereas in other laboratories they emphasized improved information flow. The paper considers how changes in processes and outcomes of work might affect responses to a computer system. It also considers the implementation process, and suggests some areas where management could benefit from an improved understanding of responses to a computer information system.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3668403     DOI: 10.1007/bf00992348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  8 in total

1.  Experience with the introduction and routine operation of a computer-based reporting system in a clinical biochemistry laboratory.

Authors:  A Fleck; R B Marshall; D Reekie; K T Irvine
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1974-07

2.  Implementation of a medical information system: evaluation of adaptation.

Authors:  M A Counte; K H Kjerulff; J C Salloway; B C Campbell
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1983

3.  A taxonomy: hospital information systems evaluation methodologies.

Authors:  J R Krobock
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Medically oriented computer-based information systems.

Authors:  A F Dowling
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Evaluation of a computerized drug review system: impact, attitudes, and interactions.

Authors:  C Siegel; M J Alexander; Y D Dlugacz; S Fischer
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1984-10

6.  Do hospital staff interfere with computer system implementation?

Authors:  A F Dowling
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  1980

7.  Computers, health care, and medical information science.

Authors:  T L Lincoln; R A Korpman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Evaluation methodology for ambulatory care information systems.

Authors:  D W Simborg; Q E Whiting-O'Keefe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.983

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Computer Rx: more harm than good?

Authors:  R Wall
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems.

Authors:  B Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Pre- and post-control model research on end-users' satisfaction with an electronic medical record: preliminary results.

Authors:  L D Gamm; C K Barsukiewicz; K H Dansky; J J Vasey; J E Bisordi; P C Thompson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.