Literature DB >> 6434131

Are patients with abnormal cervical smears adequately managed?

J M Elwood, R E Cotton, J Johnson, G M Jones, J Curnow, M W Beaver.   

Abstract

The outcome was assessed for all 1062 women in Nottingham who had a first report of abnormal cervical cytology in 1981. Satisfactory follow up could be found for only 628 (59%) of them. For 275 (26%) one subsequent normal smear had been reported but no further follow up requested. For 43 (4%), no subsequent test, after the abnormal smear, had been requested by the patient's general practitioner. Thirty patients (3%), 22 of whom had been tested at a special clinic, had not responded to a request for follow up. Even after extensive efforts we could not find the outcome in the remaining 86 (8%) of the patients. Adequate follow up of patients with abnormal cervical cytology is not being achieved. Improvements in the records systems and some changes in procedure should be made to reduce this problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6434131      PMCID: PMC1443396          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.289.6449.891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  4 in total

1.  Screening for cervical cancer: revised policy. The recommendations of the DHSS Committee on Gynaecological Cytology.

Authors:  G J Draper
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1982-05

2.  Mortality from carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  R Yule
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Behavior of moderate cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  K Nasiell; M Nasiell; V Vaćlavinková
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Women with positive cervical smears but without surgical intervention. A follow-up study.

Authors:  L J Kinlen; A I Spriggs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  4 in total
  22 in total

1.  Review of an Irish cervical smear service.

Authors:  J Dolan; E Ryan; M Thornhill; B Curran; M Leader
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Abnormal cervical cytology.

Authors:  S Higgins; P Woolley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  References and sources of College policy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  L Baillargeon; M Labrecoue; J Martin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Complacency in diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M J Campion; A Singer; H S Mitchell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-23

6.  Problems of follow-up for abnormal cervical smears: discussion paper.

Authors:  R Ellman
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Making cervical screening work.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19

Review 8.  Sex and cervical cancer.

Authors:  J D Oriel
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1988-04

9.  An evaluation of screening policies for cervical cancer in England and Wales using a computer simulation model.

Authors:  D M Parkin; S M Moss
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Research in epidemiology and community health in the medical curriculum: students' opinions of the Nottingham experience.

Authors:  J M Elwood; J C Pearson; R J Madeley; R F Logan; M W Beaver; P A Gillies; J Little; A Langham
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.