Literature DB >> 6419674

Error rates associated with the use of recently proposed breakpoints for testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa versus gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin by the standardized disk agar diffusion test.

B F Woolfrey, J M Fox, C O Quall, R T Lally.   

Abstract

Two hundred fifteen Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were tested in parallel by the disk agar diffusion test, using a standardized agar preparation, and by a microbroth test, using dilutions differing by small arithmetic increments. For gentamicin, recently proposed breakpoints of resistance (R) less than or equal to 12 mm and susceptibility (S) greater than or equal to 16 mm produced error rates of 20 and 6.8%, respectively. Limiting the error rate for susceptible interpretations to less than or equal to 2% produced a widening of the intermediate zone to include 67.4% of the isolates tested. For tobramycin, the recently proposed breakpoints of R less than or equal to 12 mm and S greater than or equal to 15 mm were associated with error rates of 66.7 and 1.4%, respectively. Breakpoints of R less than or equal to 12 mm and S greater than or equal to 13 mm were demonstrated to be equally effective when the error rate for susceptible interpretations was limited to less than or equal to 2% by error rate-bound analysis. For amikacin, proposed breakpoints of R less than or equal to 14 mm and S greater than or equal to 17 mm were associated with error rates of 27.3 and 3.2%, respectively. Limiting the error rates for susceptible interpretations to less than or equal to 2% required breakpoints of R less than or equal to 14 mm and S greater than or equal to 18 mm. The ability to establish effective susceptibility breakpoints for tobramycin and amikacin appeared not to be related to the disk agar diffusion test process itself but rather to the high degree of susceptibility of the P. aeruginosa population. These findings severely limit the usefulness of the disk agar diffusion procedure for testing P. aeruginosa versus the aminoglycosides. For this purpose, we recommend dilution tests which employ small arithmetic increment schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6419674      PMCID: PMC185939          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.24.5.764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of the moving intermediate zone concept for determing susceptibility of pseudomonads to gentamicin by the standardized disk agar-diffusion test.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; W A Ramadei; C O Quall
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Performances of Mueller-Hinton agars prepared by three manufacturers.

Authors:  A L Barry; L J Effinger
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: selection of a control strain and criteria for magnesium and calcium content in media.

Authors:  L B Reller; F D Schoenknecht; M A Kenny; J C Sherris
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  C M Metzler; R M DeHaan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Emergence in a burn center of populations of bacteria resistant to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin: evidence for the need for changes in zone diameter interpretative standards.

Authors:  B H Minshew; H M Pollock; F D Schoenknecht; J C Sherris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  [The influence of Mg ++ and Ca ++ ions on the effect of gentamycin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in agar diffusion test].

Authors:  W Hameister; H Wahlig
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1971-11

7.  Effect of different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar on the interpretation of the gentamicin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  H M Pollock; B H Minshew; M A Kenny; F D Schoenknecht
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Inability of the standardized disk agar-diffusion test to measure susceptibility of the fluorescent group of pseudomonads to gentamicin.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; W A Ramadei; C O Quall
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Effect of medium composition on the apparent sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to gentamicin.

Authors:  L P Garrod; P M Waterworth
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Effect of cation content of agar on the activity of gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  J A Washington; R J Snyder; P C Kohner; C G Wiltse; D M Ilstrup; J T McCall
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; M N Ederer; C O Quall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Antipseudomonal therapy in cystic fibrosis: aztreonam and amikacin versus ceftazidime and amikacin administered intravenously followed by oral ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  U B Schaad; J Wedgwood-Krucko; K Guenin; U Buehlmann; R Kraemer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Comparison of five methods, including the PDM Epsilometer test (E test), for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  L F Joyce; J Downes; K Stockman; J H Andrew
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: a Belgian multicenter study.

Authors:  S Lauwers; J Philippe; A Van Zeebroeck; D Pierard; M P Derde; L Kaufman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.267

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.