Literature DB >> 6403574

Comparative evaluation of the micro-media system, sceptor, and MIC-2000 microdilution methods for testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa against gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin.

B F Woolfrey, R T Lally, C O Quall.   

Abstract

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for selected strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa versus gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin were replicated in parallel with MMS (Micro-Media Systems, Potomac, Md). Sceptor (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md), and matching MIC-2000 (Dynatech Laboratories, Inc., Alexandria, Va.) twofold dilution panels and with MIC-2000 panels with dilutions differing by small arithmetic increments. The three microdilution systems produced comparable modal MICs. However, dispersion about modal values was greater for MMS than for either Sceptor or comparable MIC-2000 twofold panels. MICs were best define by MIC-2000 panels with dilutions differing by small arithmetic increments, for which 72.9% of MICs were modal, 95.4% were one small increment step or less from the modal value, and 100% were two small-increment steps or less form the modal value. The similarity of MIC replication for Sceptor and MIC-2000 twofold panels suggests the possibility of using small increment dilutions by Sceptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6403574      PMCID: PMC272627          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.17.2.312-316.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a semiautomated micro-broth dilution system for determing minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobics.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; W A Ramadei; C O Quall
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Comparison of lyophilized and frozen microtiter systems for routine MIC testing in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  E A Polk; A J Starr; H Friedman; L Erb
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Evaluation of the micro-media system for quantitative antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing: a collaborative study.

Authors:  A L Barry; R N Jones; T L Gavan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Evaluation of a dispensing instrument (Dynatech MIC-2000) for preparing microtiter antibiotic plates and testing their potency during storage.

Authors:  P R McMaster; E A Robertson; F G Witebsky; J D MacLowry
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluation of a commercial microdilution system for quantitative susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides against multidrug-resistant, gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  L R Peterson; D N Gerding; M M Johnson; J E Cherne; B J Opfer; W H Hall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Broth microdilution testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and aminoglycosides: need for employing dilutions differing by small arithmetic increments.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; J M Fox; R T Lally; C O Quall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Performance of a commercial microdilution minimal inhibitory concentration procedure for aminoglycoside susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  D C Etowski; D G Beckwith
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Gentamicin and amikacin disk susceptibility tests with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: definition of minimal inhibitory concentration correlates for susceptible and resistant categories.

Authors:  A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Gentamicin, tobramycin, and sisomicin disc susceptibility tests. Revised zone standards for interpretation.

Authors:  A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R N Jones; E H Gerlach
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Comparison of minimum inhibitory concentration values determined by three antimicrobic dilution methods for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; J M Fox; C O Quall
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.493

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 49189, a new quality control strain for testing P. aeruginosa susceptibility to the aminoglycosides.

Authors:  R T Lally; B F Woolfrey; M A Enright
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Error rates associated with the use of recently proposed breakpoints for testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa versus gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin by the standardized disk agar diffusion test.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; J M Fox; C O Quall; R T Lally
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of the Sceptor Pseudomonas Plus MIC Panel with agar dilution for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  L F Joyce; K Stockman; J Downes; J H Andrew
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Microdilution aminoglycoside susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli: correlation between MICs of clinical isolates and quality control organisms.

Authors:  T A Larson; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.