Literature DB >> 639216

The prognostic spectrum of left main stenosis.

M J Conley, R L Ely, J Kisslo, K L Lee, J F McNeer, R A Rosati.   

Abstract

Three-year survival for 163 consecutive medically treated patients with 50% or greater left main stenosis was 50%. Survival was significantly higher for patients with 50 to 70% left main stenosis (one and three-year survivals of 91% and 66%) than for patients with 70% or greater left main stenosis (one and three-year survivals of 72% and 41%). In fact, left main lesions of less than 70% were not associated with the increased risk usually attributed to patients with left main stenosis. A number of noninvasive and catheterization characteristics were significant predictors of survival for patients with 70% or greater left main stenosis. Noninvasive descriptors defined a low risk subgroup (one and three-year survivals of 97% and 74%) and a high risk subgroup (one- and three-year survivals of 59% and 25%). These observations have important implications both in assessing therapeutic interventions and in managing individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 639216     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.57.5.947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  28 in total

1.  Impact of left main coronary artery disease on long-term mortality in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Se Hun Kang; Cheol Whan Lee; Seunghee Baek; Pil Hyung Lee; Jung-Min Ahn; Duk-Woo Park; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Specific perfusion pattern in stress 201Tl myocardial scintigraphy of left main coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Wakasugi; N Shibata; T Kobayashi; Y Fudemoto; Y Hasegawa; S Nakano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1986

3.  Selection of patients for direct myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  R W Anderson; W S Ring
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Current Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Intervention.

Authors:  Harsha S Nagarajarao; Chandra P Ojha; Venkatachalam Mulukutla; Ahmed Ibrahim; Adriana C Mares; Timir K Paul
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main revascularization: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Nirav Patel; Rajat Kalra; Peter Marogil; Ashwanikumar Bhardwaj; Garima Arora; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2017-07-01

Review 6.  Do coronary artery bypass operations prolong life?

Authors:  K W Carr; R L Engler; J Ross
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-04

7.  Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?

Authors:  T Stiermaier; G Schuler; E Boudriot; S Desch; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Long term follow up after elective percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected non-bifurcational left main stenosis: is it time to change the guidelines?

Authors:  B R G Brueren; J M P G Ernst; M J Suttorp; J M ten Berg; B J W M Rensing; E G Mast; E T Bal; A J Six; H W M Plokker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left main stem stenosis: outcomes, concerns and controversies.

Authors:  Leonidas V Athanasopoulos; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease - A Single Hospital Experience without On-Site Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yang Cheng; Kuang-Te Wang; Wen-Hsiung Lin; Jui-Peng Tsai; Yung-Tzi Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.