Literature DB >> 6389051

The effect of inadvertent intraoperative perforation on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer.

C A Slanetz.   

Abstract

Inadvertent perforation of the bowel during curative resection for colorectal cancer has serious consequences. In 174 curative resections with spillage, five-year survival was 29 per cent. In 67 patients where the cancer itself was disrupted during dissection, five-year survival fell to 14 per cent in the colon and to 9.3 per cent in the rectum. Local recurrence developed in 65 per cent of spillage cases. In Dukes' C tumors that were perforated during surgery, local recurrence occurred in 87 per cent. As surgeons, our efforts must be directed toward preventing injury to the bowel during definitive resection of colorectal cancers. The instillation of tumoricidal solutions within the bowel lumen and the application of bowel ligatures prior to dissection may help toward preventing recurrence, should inadvertent perforation and spillage occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6389051     DOI: 10.1007/bf02553942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

1.  Oncological outcome after incidental perforation in radical rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Fredrik Jörgren; Robert Johansson; Lena Damber; Gudrun Lindmark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  L Påhlman; B Glimelius
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Lisa Martin Hawver; Ziad Awad; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Prospective randomized trial evaluating mandatory second look surgery with HIPEC and CRS vs. standard of care in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases.

Authors:  Robert T Ripley; Jeremy L Davis; Clinton D Kemp; Seth M Steinberg; Mary Ann Toomey; Itzhak Avital
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  The surgical anatomy of the rectum--a review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation.

Authors:  J M Church; P J Raudkivi; G L Hill
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence?

Authors:  A M Akyol; J R McGregor; D J Galloway; G D Murray; W D George
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Hok Kwok Choi; Yee Man Lee; Judy W C Ho; Chi Leung Seto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group.

Authors:  J G Docherty; J R McGregor; A M Akyol; G D Murray; D J Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.