Literature DB >> 6374910

Childbirth and social class: the case of cesarean delivery.

M Hurst, P S Summey.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine how obstetrical intervention in childbirth varies according to the socioeconomic status of the birthing woman and what kinds of factors might account for the differences in treatment. We have focused specifically on the contemporary use of cesarean delivery to illustrate how one intervention is applied differently to women of different social classes. If cesarean deliveries were being done for medical reasons alone, we would see any variation in the rates explained by medical risk, and the highest rates among high risk women. Instead we found that more cesareans are being performed in the socioeconomic group of women with the lowest medical risk and much of the variation in cesarean rates explained by factors other than medical need. We focus mainly on characteristics associated with social class differences, and use historical and contemporary data to describe differences in cesarean delivery rates by social class, and to offer explanations for these differences. In addition we introduce some new New York City data to examine more closely cesarean delivery rates in two classes of birthing women and to explore the differential effects of new childbirth technology on women of different socioeconomic classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6374910     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90290-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

2.  Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Rune Sørensen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Experiment and illusion in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  J Guillemin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1994-03

4.  Holding back the tide of caesareans.

Authors:  J Lomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-03

5.  Caesarean deliveries in the Mother-Child (Rhea) cohort in Crete, Greece: almost as frequent as vaginal births and even more common in first-time mothers.

Authors:  M Vassilaki; L Chatzi; M Rasidaki; E Bagkeris; G Kritsotakis; T Roumeliotaki; A Koutis; A Philalithis; M Kogevinas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Charges for comprehensive obstetric care at teaching and nonteaching hospitals. A comparison.

Authors:  G S Gordon; S E Sefcik; J P Lo Gerfo
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-12

7.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Caesarean delivery and its correlates in Northern Region of Bangladesh: application of logistic regression and cox proportional hazard model.

Authors:  Mostafizur Rahman; Asma Ahmad Shariff; Aziz Shafie; Rahmah Saaid; Rohayatimah Md Tahir
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.

Authors:  Mrigesh Bhatia; Kajori Banerjee; Priyanka Dixit; Laxmi Kant Dwivedi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.