Literature DB >> 6370542

A clinical and pharmacokinetic basis for the selection and use of slow release theophylline products.

L Hendeles, R P Iafrate, M Weinberger.   

Abstract

In order to achieve the greatest chance for maximum benefit from theophylline in the management of chronic asthma, the serum concentration should be maintained in the therapeutic range of 10 to 20 micrograms/ml. Conventional rapid release formulations produce excessive fluctuations in serum concentrations that can result in variability in clinical response between doses. In contrast, slow release formulations have the potential to achieve relatively constant serum concentrations with 12-hour dosing intervals, thus providing around-the-clock stabilisation of the hyper-reactive airways that characterise chronic asthma. Furthermore, the decreased frequency of dosing with these formulations can improve patient compliance. However, significant differences in rate and extent of absorption exist between the available formulations. Single-dose bioavailability studies comparing a slow release product with an oral solution or plain uncoated tablet in a crossover design permit examination of the rate and extent of absorption. Comparison of a slow release product with an oral reference following multiple doses at steady-state permits examination of the extent but generally not rate of absorption. The mean fraction absorbed-time profile, calculated from a modification of the Wagner-Nelson equation, is a process-independent method of comparing rates of absorption of different products after single doses. A prospective study in 14 children with chronic asthma has demonstrated that this modified equation, when rearranged to iteratively solve for serum concentrations, can accurately predict steady-state serum concentrations for different dosing intervals in patient populations with different rates of elimination. When slow release products are compared in this manner at 8- or 12-hour dosing intervals for patients with slow elimination, clinically relevant differences between brands are not apparent. However, in patients with rapid elimination, i.e. children, cigarette smokers, and 25% of non-smoking adults, application of this method shows that only some formulations (i.e. 'Slo-Bid Gyrocaps' and 'Theo-Dur', which is also marketed under different brand names names such as 'Sustaire', 'Pulmi-Dur' and 'Theolin Retard') can maintain serum concentrations within the therapeutic range for an entire 12-hour dosing interval. More rapidly absorbed slow release products must be administered at 8-hour dosing intervals in patients with rapid elimination, despite promotional claims to the contrary. Current products promoted for once-a-day administration are clinically inadequate because of incomplete and erratic absorption, and/or excessive serum concentration fluctuations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6370542     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198409020-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  107 in total

1.  Relationship of theophylline clearance to oral dosage in children with chronic asthma.

Authors:  E Ginchansky; M Weinberger
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Comparison of standard- and sustained-release theophylline tablets in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  J Dasta; J M Mirtallo; M Altman
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1979-05

3.  Pharmacokinetics of theophylline. Application to adjustment of the clinical dose of aminophylline.

Authors:  J W Jenne; M S Wyze; F S Rood; F M MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1972 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Effect of food on the bioavailability and pattern of release of a sustained-release theophylline tablet.

Authors:  N H Leeds; P Gal; A A Purohit; J B Walter
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  A multiple-dose study of sustained-release theophylline and aminophylline.

Authors:  M C Meyer; A B Straughn; P Lieberman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Absolute bioavailability of oral theophylline.

Authors:  L Hendeles; M Weinberger; L Bighley
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1977-05

7.  Nonlinear theophylline elimination.

Authors:  D D Tang-Liu; R L Williams; S Riegelman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Efficacy of a 12-hour sustained-release preparation in maintaining therapeutic serum theophylline levels in asthmatic children.

Authors:  H W Kelly; S Murphy
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in hepatic disease.

Authors:  A Mangione; T E Imhoff; R V Lee; L Y Shum; W J Jusko
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Bioavailability of sustained-release theophylline granules in apple sauce in pediatric asthmatic patients.

Authors:  G Z Lotner; G E Vanderpool; S Carroll; D G Tinkelman; D L Spangler
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1983-01
View more
  28 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of an osmotic pump tablet (OPT) for chlorpromazine using (SBE)7m-beta-CD.

Authors:  K Okimoto; A Ohike; R Ibuki; O Aoki; N Ohnishi; T Irie; K Uekama; R A Rajewski; V J Stella
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  The influence of codeine, propantheline and metoclopramide on small bowel transit and theophylline absorption from a sustained-release formulation.

Authors:  D K Sommers; E C Meyer; M Van Wyk; J Moncrieff; J R Snyman; R J Grimbeek
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Theophylline steady state pharmacokinetics is not altered by omeprazole.

Authors:  A M Taburet; J Geneve; M Bocquentin; G Simoneau; C Caulin; E Singlas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Fraction of theophylline in sustained-release formulation which is absorbed from the large bowel.

Authors:  D K Sommers; E C Meyer; M van Wyk; J Moncrieff
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Impaired absorption of paracetamol in vegetarians.

Authors:  L F Prescott; K Yoovathaworn; K Makarananda; R Saivises; K Sriwatanakul
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  The effect of ciprofloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

Authors:  K T Batty; T M Davis; K F Ilett; L J Dusci; S R Langton
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Furosemide disposition in patients on CAPD.

Authors:  U Martin; R J Winney; L F Prescott
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  The effect of food on the absorption of controlled-release theophylline in mini-swine.

Authors:  G K Shiu; A O Sager; R B Velagapudi; V K Prasad; J P Skelly
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Theophylline pharmacokinetics following single and repeated administration of slow-release capsules.

Authors:  J Torrent; I Izquierdo; M J Barbanoj; R Obach; M Nomen; F Jane
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 10.  The effect of respiratory disorders on clinical pharmacokinetic variables.

Authors:  A M Taburet; C Tollier; C Richard
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.