Literature DB >> 6370419

Nonmetastatic tumor cells acquire metastatic properties following somatic hybridization with normal cells.

P De Baetselier, E Roos, L Brys, L Remels, M Gobert, D Dekegel, S Segal, M Feldman.   

Abstract

Somatic cell hybridization between nonmetastatic tumor cells and normal cells of the lymphoreticular system results in hybrid cells manifesting metastatic properties of defined target organ specificity. Thus, fusion of the nonmetastatic BALB/c originated NSI plasmacytoma with C57BL B lymphocytes resulted in hybridomas, each of which were metastatic. Of 10 hybridomas, 7 generated metastases in the spleen and liver, whereas 3 generated liver metastases. The generation of liver metastases by hybridomas which homed to both spleen and liver, but not by those which homed to the liver only, was controlled by the spleen. The acquisition of metastatic properties via somatic cell fusion seems to represent a general principle, in which the normal partner determines the target organ specificity for the metastatic growth. Thus, fusion of SP2/O myeloma cells with syngeneic B lymphocytes also resulted in a hybrid cell metastasizing to the spleen and liver, yet a somatic hybrid between NSI and a macrophage or dendritic-like cell metastasized to the lung. Cell surface molecules encoded by the genome of the normal partner was demonstrated to control the target organ specificity: antibodies against MHC-encoded antigens of the normal B cell partner prevented the generation of metastases by hybridomas metastasizing to the spleen and liver, but not by those metastasizing to the liver only. This is in accordance with the function of MHC molecules on lymphocytes in controlling their homing to lymphoid organs. Hybridomas of T cell lymphomas also manifested metastatic properties. Analysis of the cell surface Thy-1 antigens of a hybridoma (DCH10), produced via somatic fusion between BW5145 lymphoma and a putative macrophage cell indicated that cells of liver metastases (DCH10-Li) generated by the hybrid cells might have undergone further somatic cell fusion in vivo with host (T?) cells. These cells have acquired new metastatic properties, generating metastases in spleen, liver and kidneys. In fact, even the inoculation of the parental BW lymphoma cells resulted in a case of liver metastasis (BW-Li). Such BW-Li cells, upon reinoculation, also generated metastases in the spleen, liver and kidneys. Analysis of the Thyl phenotype indicated that BW-Li cells may also have undergone somatic cell fusion in vivo with host (T?) cells, resulting in the acquisition of metastatic properties. The pattern of cell-cell interactions (adhesion, infiltration) with liver cell monolayers of BW-Li cells and of DCH10-Li (T-cell lymphomas) was identical, and differed from cells of liver metastases of the myeloma-B cell hybridomas which might be based on responses to liver growth signals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6370419     DOI: 10.1007/bf00047690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  44 in total

1.  "Hybrid" type cells in combined cultures of two different mammalian cell strains.

Authors:  G BARSKI; S SORIEUL; F CORNEFERT
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Shifts in tumor cell phenotypes induced by signals from the microenvironment. Relevance for the immunobiology of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  V Schirrmacher
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.144

3.  Antigenic variation in cancer metastasis: immune escape versus immune control.

Authors:  V Schirrmacher; M Fogel; E Russmann; K Bosslet; P Altevogt; L Beck
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Rat thy-1 antigens from thymus and brain: their tissue distribution, purification, and chemical composition.

Authors:  A F Williams; A N Barclay; M Letarte-Muirhead; R J Morris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1977

5.  Selection of an immunogenic 3LL tumor subline following serial growth in vivo in the local presence of peritoneal macrophages.

Authors:  P De Baetselier; A Kapon; S Katsav; M Feldman; S Segal
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Characterization in vivo and in vitro of tumor cells selected for resistance to syngeneic lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity.

Authors:  I J Fidler; D M Gersten; M B Budmen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Involvement of the spleen in murine B cell differentiation.

Authors:  Y Ron; P De Baetselier; S Segal
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Effects of oxygen radical scavengers and antioxidants on phagocyte-induced mutagenesis.

Authors:  S A Weitzman; T P Stossel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Proof of in vivo fusion of murine tumor cells with host cells by universal fusers.

Authors:  R Ber; F Wiener; E M Fenyö
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Specialized antigen-presenting cells. Splenic dendritic cells and peritoneal-exudate cells induced by mycobacteria activate effector T cells that are resistant to suppression.

Authors:  J S Britz; P W Askenase; W Ptak; R M Steinman; R K Gershon
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1982-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  21 in total

1.  Interaction of B-cell hybridomas with fibroblast or hepatocyte monolayers in vitro and their metastatic behaviour in vivo.

Authors:  S Verhaegen; H Verschueren; J Brissinck; D Van Hecke; D Dekegel; P De Baetselier
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  The cellular basis of metastasis.

Authors:  P Ruiz; U Günthert
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Cell fusion as a hidden force in tumor progression.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Yibin Kang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Implications of tumor progression on clinical oncology.

Authors:  D R Welch; S P Tomasovic
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1985 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Cellular interactions in metastasis.

Authors:  F R Miller; G H Heppner
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 6.  Quantitative genetic analysis of tumor progression.

Authors:  V Ling; A F Chambers; J F Harris; R P Hill
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 7.  Somatic cell fusion as a source of genetic rearrangement leading to metastatic variants.

Authors:  L Larizza; V Schirrmacher
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Melanoma x macrophage hybrids with enhanced metastatic potential.

Authors:  M Rachkovsky; S Sodi; A Chakraborty; Y Avissar; J Bolognia; J M McNiff; J Platt; D Bermudes; J Pawelek
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 9.  Perspectives on the mesenchymal origin of metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Leanne C Huysentruyt; Thomas N Seyfried
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  Growth regulation of cancer metastases by their host organ.

Authors:  N S Sargent; M Oestreicher; H Haidvogl; H M Madnick; M M Burger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.