Literature DB >> 6370228

Purification and characterization of mouse alcohol dehydrogenase from two inbred strains that differ in total liver enzyme activity.

D K Rex, W F Bosron, T K Li.   

Abstract

Alcohol dehydrogenase activity in mouse liver homogenate-supernatants is 1.7 times greater in the C57BL/10 strain than in the BALB/c strain, regardless of whether activity is expressed in units per gram liver, total liver, or milligram DNA. The Km values for ethanol and NAD+, approximately 0.4 and 0.03 mM, respectively, of enzyme purified from both strains are similar. Moreover, the Ki for NADH, 1 microM, the pH optimum for ethanol oxidation, 10.5, and the Vmax for ethanol oxidation, 160 min-1, for ADH from the C57BL/10 and BALB/c strains are similar. Therefore, the difference in ADH activity in the two strains cannot be due to differences in the catalytic properties of the enzyme. The electrophoretic and isoelectric focusing patterns and two-dimensional tryptic peptide maps of the purified enzyme from both strains are identical. Thus the amino acid sequences of enzyme from C57BL/10 and BALB/c mice must also be identical or very similar. The difference in ADH activity in the two strains is most likely the result of genetic differences in the content of ADH protein in liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6370228     DOI: 10.1007/bf00499291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Genet        ISSN: 0006-2928            Impact factor:   1.890


  28 in total

1.  Two-dimensional thin-layer methods.

Authors:  R W Gracy
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Double-ternary complex affinity chromatography: preparation of alcohol dehydrogenases.

Authors:  L G Lange; B L Vallee
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-10-19       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Heterogeneity of alcohol dehydrogenase from human liver.

Authors:  R Pietruszko; H Theorell; C De Zalenski
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 4.013

4.  Differences in thiol groups and multiple forms of rat liver alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  H Jörnvall
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1973-08-21       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Enzyme activities and ethanol preference in mice.

Authors:  J R Sheppard; P Albersheim; G E McClearn
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetic control of mitochondrial malic enzyme in mouse brain.

Authors:  E G Bernstine
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1979-01-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Statistical analysis of enzyme kinetic data.

Authors:  W W Cleland
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  The genetic and developmental regulation of hepatic delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase in mice.

Authors:  D Doyle; R T Schimke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1969-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Electrophoretic analyses of alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase, aldehyde oxidase, sorbitol dehydrogenase and xanthine oxidase from mouse tissues.

Authors:  R S Holmes
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B       Date:  1978
View more
  5 in total

1.  Cloning and sequencing of cDNA encoding the complete mouse liver alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  H J Edenberg; K Zhang; K Fong; W F Bosron; T K Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Live cell imaging of cytosolic NADH/NAD+ ratio in hepatocytes and liver slices.

Authors:  Ricard Masia; William J McCarty; Carolina Lahmann; Jay Luther; Raymond T Chung; Martin L Yarmush; Gary Yellen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Purification and characterization of the Danish (Skive) variant of mouse liver alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  D K Rex; W F Bosron; F Dwulet; T K Li
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Comparison of glucokinase in C3H/He and C58 mice that differ in their hepatic activity.

Authors:  P A James; F L Lavender; G M Lawrence; D G Walker
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Genetically determined differences in liver alcohol dehydrogenase activity in male rats.

Authors:  D W Crabb; T K Li
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.890

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.