Literature DB >> 6367112

Use of a Bayesian algorithm in the computer-assisted diagnosis of appendicitis.

F H Edwards, R S Davies.   

Abstract

One hundred consecutive patients with acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain were prospectively evaluated with a computerized Bayesian diagnostic algorithm. An accuracy rate of 92 per cent was obtained. Computer recommendations would have resulted in a negative exploration rate of 9 per cent, as compared with the rate of 19 per cent which was actually obtained. Even though our clinical management of these patients was in keeping with accepted standards, the Bayesian program would have avoided eight unnecessary operations. In all instances in which the patient presented with appendicitis, the computer correctly predicted that appendicitis was present. Computer-assisted diagnostic programs using a Bayesian approach may have some role in the evaluation of right lower quadrant abdominal pain. The technique presented herein describes a means of developing a database of conditional probabilities without reliance on large patient surveys. Even with this refinement, the Bayesian approach to diagnosis remains complex. The development of this type of program requires close interaction between computer scientists and surgeons. Nevertheless, the approach does appear promising and it may well be worth the considerable effort required to initiate such a system. The exact role for Bayesian diagnostic analysis cannot be predicted at this point. Certainly it should have no greater importance than a routine laboratory test. Perhaps the results of Bayesian analysis in this setting might assume a diagnostic significance similar to that of the white blood cell count. The work of DeDombal has done much to eliminate the physician reluctance seen with earlier programs. It has become increasingly apparent that computers may perform many clinically useful functions without infringing upon the art of medicine. The computer assisted diagnosis of acute abdominal pain may well constitute one such function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6367112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  6 in total

Review 1.  Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Vijayraghavan Sundararajan; Ashok W Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The price of better diagnostic accuracy in suspected appendicitis in Jerusalem.

Authors:  P E Slater; R Ben-Dom; M S Rosenbluth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  The correlation between gross appearance of the appendix at appendicectomy and histological examination.

Authors:  M W Jones; A G Paterson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  [Does measuring axillo-rectal temperature difference help in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis?].

Authors:  H Putzki; B Reichert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1988

5.  Appendicitis in mature patients.

Authors:  R P Burns; J L Cochran; W L Russell; R M Bard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.

Authors:  F Christian; G P Christian
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.