Literature DB >> 6366135

Influence of tumor estrogen and progesterone receptor levels on the response to tamoxifen and chemotherapy in primary breast cancer.

B Fisher, C Redmond, A Brown, D L Wickerham, N Wolmark, J Allegra, G Escher, M Lippman, E Savlov, J Wittliff.   

Abstract

In 1977 the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project initiated a prospectively randomized clinical trial for women with primary operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. In this study 1891 patients were randomized to receive L-phenylalanine mustard and 5-fluorouracil (PF) either with or without tamoxifen (T). In this interim report findings are presented concerning disease-free survival (DFS) and survival as related to age and to estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) content of the tumor. The median follow-up time is 3 yr. Patients 50 yr of age or older with either 1-3 or more than 3 positive axillary nodes had a markedly longer disease-free survival on PFT than did those receiving PF adjuvant therapy (p less than 0.001). The effectiveness of PFT was related to the levels of tumor receptors. Patients 50 yr old or more with both tumor ER and PR levels of 10 fmole or more ("high") displayed the greatest benefit in disease-free survival from PFT (p = 0.004). Analyses by age indicated that it is more appropriate to divide patients of 50 yr or older into two age groups, 50-59 and 60-70 yr old. In the former the survival results were poorer on PFT when tumor PR was low, whereas, regardless of receptor levels, those 60-70 yr old experienced an advantage on PFT. In women under 50 yr of age, there was no difference in disease-free survival (p = 0.64), but survival results favored the PF over the PFT treated (p = 0.06). Patients under 50 yr with tumor ER and PR levels under 10 fmole ("low") had a poorer survival when given PFT (p = 0.003). Those whose tumors demonstrated a high ER and a low PR also had a shorter survival on PFT (p = 0.01). The observation of no benefit in younger patients when both receptor levels were high, but a benefit in older patients with receptor-poor tumors, indicates that, at least according to the conditions of this study, the difference between the two age groups cannot be explained by the association of age with receptor content. Multivariate analyses considered the effects of the number of positive nodes, age, ER, and PR. They support the conclusion that, while nodes and ER exert strong prognostic influences in both PF- and PFT-treated patients, the PR content of tumors is a stronger predictor of the effectiveness of PFT therapy than is ER content.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6366135     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1983.1.4.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

1.  New strategies in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Bonadonna
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1986-12

Review 2.  [No advantage to using the CMF-regimen for node positive, postmenopausal, receptor-positive mammary carcinoma with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy].

Authors:  E Heidemann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 4.  Endocrine therapy of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A Manni
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression and benefit from tamoxifen in the treatment and prevention of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Chungyeul Kim; Gong Tang; Katherine L Pogue-Geile; Joseph P Costantino; Frederick L Baehner; Joffre Baker; Maureen T Cronin; Drew Watson; Steven Shak; Olga L Bohn; Debora Fumagalli; Yusuke Taniyama; Ahwon Lee; Megan L Reilly; Victor G Vogel; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark; Soonmyung Paik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cytoplasmic estrogen receptor in breast cancer.

Authors:  Allison W Welsh; Donald R Lannin; Gregory S Young; Mark E Sherman; Jonine D Figueroa; N Lynn Henry; Lisa Ryden; Chungyeul Kim; Richard R Love; Rachel Schiff; David L Rimm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  The oestrogen antagonists, tamoxifen and FC-1157a, display oestrogen like effects on human lymphocyte functions in vitro.

Authors:  T Paavonen; L C Andersson
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Anthracycline Use for Early Stage Breast Cancer in the Modern Era: a Review.

Authors:  Sakshi Jasra; Jesus Anampa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-05-11

9.  Tumor nuclear grade, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor: their value alone or in combination as indicators of outcome following adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; E R Fisher; C Redmond; A Brown
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Simultaneous and sequential determinations of steroid hormone receptors in human breast cancer. Influence of intervening therapy.

Authors:  R Jakesz; C Dittrich; J Hanusch; R Kolb; R Lenzhofer; K Moser; H Rainer; G Reiner; M Schemper; J Spona
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.