Literature DB >> 6365828

Direct and indirect determination of nonuniform cell density distribution in human corneal endothelium.

B H Schimmelpfennig.   

Abstract

The density distribution of endothelial cells was determined, directly and indirectly, by counting cells and cell nuclei in two separate groups of unpaired human corneas. Four areas, measuring 1 square mm each, were counted in the corneal center as well as in the periphery close to Schwalbe's line. In 19 Orcein-stained corneas, the peripheral density of nuclei was 3632/mm2 +/- 592 (SD) as compared with central counts of 2778 mm2 +/- 284 (SD). The other group of 22 corneas, stained supravitally with Alizarin-red revealed a peripheral cell density of 3696/mm2 +/- 721 (SD), in contrast with a central density of 2811/mm2 +/- 425 (SD). There was also an uneven density distribution in the central endothelium. The average difference between the highest and lowest central square millimeter counts in the two groups was 8.0 +/- 7.7% (SD) and 9.0 +/- 3.6% (SD), respectively. The data indicate a nonuniform endothelial cell density distribution in the human cornea that may have clinical implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6365828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  14 in total

1.  Is manual counting of corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks still acceptable? The French experience.

Authors:  G Thuret; C Manissolle; S Acquart; J-C Le Petit; J Maugery; L Campos-Guyotat; M J Doughty; P Gain
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The effects of corneal parameters on the assessment of endothelial cell density in the elderly eye.

Authors:  A Müller; J P Craig; C N Grupcheva; C N J McGhee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Revisiting Existing Evidence of Corneal Endothelial Progenitors and Their Potential Therapeutic Applications in Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yaa-Jyuhn J Meir; Hung-Chi Chen; Chien-Chang Chen; Hui-Kang D Ma
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Age-related modifications of the corneal endothelium in adults.

Authors:  Anna M Roszkowska; Pietro Colosi; Paolo D'Angelo; Giuseppe Ferreri
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Corneal stem cells and tissue engineering: Current advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Aline Lütz de Araujo; José Álvaro Pereira Gomes
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Regenerative Cell Therapy for Corneal Endothelium.

Authors:  Alena Bartakova; Noelia J Kunzevitzky; Jeffrey L Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2014-09-01

7.  Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  T Röck; M Bramkamp; K U Bartz-Schmidt; D Röck; E Yörük
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Cell pattern in adult human corneal endothelium.

Authors:  Carlos H Wörner; Alicia Olguín; José L Ruíz-García; Nuria Garzón-Jiménez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Progenitors for the corneal endothelium and trabecular meshwork: a potential source for personalized stem cell therapy in corneal endothelial diseases and glaucoma.

Authors:  Wing Yan Yu; Carl Sheridan; Ian Grierson; Sharon Mason; Victoria Kearns; Amy Cheuk Yin Lo; David Wong
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-06

Review 10.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: The vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis.

Authors:  Stephan Ong Tone; Viridiana Kocaba; Myriam Böhm; Adam Wylegala; Tomas L White; Ula V Jurkunas
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.