Literature DB >> 6365190

Distinction between changes in membrane potential and surface charge upon chemotactic stimulation of Escherichia coli.

M Eisenbach, Y Margolin, A Ciobotariu, H Rottenberg.   

Abstract

Galactose and other chemotactic attractants have been shown to trigger an apparent hyperpolarization in Escherichia coli (Eisenbach, M., 1982, Biochemistry, 21:6818-6825). The probe used to measure membrane potential in that study, tetraphenylphosphonium (TPP+), may respond also to surface-charge changes in the membrane. The distinction between true changes in membrane potential and changes in the surface charge of the membrane is crucial for the study of this phenomenon in bacterial chemotaxis. To distinguish between these parameters, we compared the response to galactose with different techniques: K+ distribution in the presence of valinomycin (measured with a K+-selective electrode), TPP+ distribution (measured with a TPP+-selective electrode) at different ionic strengths, absorbance changes of bis(3-phenyl-5-oxoisoxazol-4-yl)pentamethineoxonol (oxonol V), and fluorescence changes of three probes with different mechanisms of response. All the techniques revealed stimulation by galactose of transient hyperpolarization, of comparable magnitude. This indicates the involvement of ion currents rather than alterations of local surface properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6365190      PMCID: PMC1434852          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84169-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  27 in total

1.  Measurement of membrane potential in Bacillus subtilis: a comparison of lipophilic cations, rubidium ion, and a cyanine dye as probes.

Authors:  A Zaritsky; M Kihara; R M Macnab
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Receptor structure in the bacterial sensing system.

Authors:  E A Wang; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Changes in membrane potential of Escherichia coli in response to temporal gradients of chemicals.

Authors:  M Eisenbach
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1982-12-21       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Membrane electricity as a convertible energy currency for the cell.

Authors:  V P Skulachev
Journal:  Can J Biochem       Date:  1980-03

5.  Probes of membrane potential in Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  A Ghazi; E Schechter; L Letellier; B Labedan
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1981-03-23       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Improved fluorescent probes for the measurement of rapid changes in membrane potential.

Authors:  A Grinvald; R Hildesheim; I C Farber; L Anglister
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Cyanine dye as monitor of membrane potentials in Escherichia coli cells and membrane vesicles.

Authors:  L Letellier; E Shechter
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1979-12-17

8.  Charge-shift probes of membrane potential: a probable electrochromic mechanism for p-aminostyrylpyridinium probes on a hemispherical lipid bilayer.

Authors:  L M Loew; L L Simpson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Quantitative measurements of the proton-motive force and its relation to steady state lactose accumulation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Ahmed; I R Booth
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1981-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Membrane potential in a potassium transport-negative mutant of Escherichia coli K-12. The distribution of rubidium in the presence of valinomycin indicates a higher potential than that of the tetraphenylphosphonium cation.

Authors:  E P Bakker
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1982-09-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Voltage clamp effects on bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Y Margolin; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Role of proton motive force in phototactic and aerotactic responses of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

Authors:  J P Armitage; C Ingham; M C Evans
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.490

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.