Literature DB >> 6360514

Rheumatoid arthritis: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

J R Kirwan, H L Currey.   

Abstract

A review of the trials in which 'disease-modifying' drugs have been tested leads to the following conclusions: (a) Most of these trials do not provide acceptable evidence of the efficacy of these drugs. (b) A well-designed, placebo-controlled, study of gold (Empire Rheumatism Council, 1960, 1961) provides strong evidence that the drug has a beneficial effect lasting about 18 months. It does not establish any advantage beyond that period. Two reports which claim to show a favourable influence of gold on radiological progression are suspect because of faults in trial design. (c) There has been only one placebo-controlled study of penicillamine (Multicentre Trial Group, 1973). This also provides evidence of medium-term efficacy. No information is available about x-ray progression. (d) Studies of other drugs for which 'disease-modifying' activity has been claimed (antimalarials, antiproliferative agents, corticosteroids, etc.) have similarly provided evidence only of medium-term efficacy. With information now available it is possible to identify some of the reasons why these trials have failed to answer the fundamentally important question of whether the drugs can modify the long-term course of RA. (a) Trial designs have concentrated on following process measures (e.g., ESR) rather than outcome measures (e.g., disability and deformity). Observers have thus come to accept the former as being important in themselves, to the neglect of the latter. (b) Psychological pressures to provide relief for patients, combined with unjustified assumptions about the long-term efficacy of these drugs, have produced a climate of expectations amongst both clinicians and patients which makes it difficult to sustain long-term trials against placebo. (c) Traditional radiological assessment methods have proved insensitive. (d) Recent advances in clinical trial design and analysis (developed largely in specialties outside rheumatology) were not available at the time of most of these trials. At this stage clinical trials of 'disease-modifying' drugs should seek to answer the following questions: (a) Is it worth giving drugs such as gold and penicillamine for periods longer than 6 months? (b) How long does the effect of such treatment last? (c) Is any information obtainable before or during treatment which predicts favourable or unfavourable responses? To answer these question, trial designs, will need to include: (a) Larger numbers of patients. (b) Longer duration of treatment and follow up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6360514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0307-742X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Combination chemotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P M Brooks; A C Schwarzer
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Corticosteroids in rheumatoid arthritis: is a trial of their 'disease modifying' potential feasible?

Authors:  M A Byron; J R Kirwan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: radiological assessments and the effects of anti-rheumatic drugs.

Authors:  D L Scott; P A Bacon
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Assessing the progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D L Scott; M Farr
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  The effects of auranofin and parenteral gold in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an X-ray analysis.

Authors:  A Larsen; J Horton; C Howland
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Nitrogen mustard and methylprednisolone in severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Kalra; A E Blake; D L Scott; A J Popert
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Prediction of progressive joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving gold or D-penicillamine therapy.

Authors:  P T Dawes; P D Fowler; R Jackson; M Collins; M F Shadforth; R Stone; D L Scott
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. III. British rheumatologists' judgments of 'change in response to therapy'.

Authors:  J R Kirwan; D M Chaput de Saintonge; C R Joyce; H L Currey
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 19.103

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.