Literature DB >> 6359515

Visual acuity norms in young children.

K Simons.   

Abstract

There are no universally accepted standards for visual acuity tests or norms in young (3-6-year-old) children, although acuity measurement is important in both clinical and screening settings. This review outlines the requirements for such standards. Although more research is needed, available data suggest that a standard test should meet the following requirements. It should utilize a letter optotype (tumbling E, Landolt C, or HOTV variant of the STYCAR), and single optotype with contour interaction bar surround. It should permit nonverbal pointing responses in younger children and verbal responses in older children. If an orientation-specifying method is followed, as with the E or Landolt C, the test should use a three-alternative choice--up, down, and sideways with a nondifferentiated left-right--rather than the traditional four alternative choice. A C-like O pseudo-optotype should be considered in a paired-comparison test format when the Landolt C is utilized, with a similar format for the tumbling E if a suitable pseudo-optotype can be derived. The optical grating test, which is widely used in infant testing, may underestimate acuity deficits and so is not a test of choice for determination of Snellen-equivalent acuity. A letter-based variant of the grating test may hold promise. Reduction in testing distance from 6 to 3 or 4 meters is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6359515     DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(83)90076-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  17 in total

1.  Use of Lea symbols in young children.

Authors:  M X Repka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia.

Authors:  D K Newman; M M East
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  In the absence of strabismus what constitutes a visual deficit in children?

Authors:  S J Shea; L Gaccon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Normative pediatric visual acuity using single surrounded HOTV optotypes on the Electronic Visual Acuity Tester following the Amblyopia Treatment Study protocol.

Authors:  James R Drover; Joost Felius; Christina S Cheng; Sarah E Morale; Lauren Wyatt; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Visual acuity in preschool children: the Chapel Hill-Durham Day-Care Vision Study.

Authors:  J C Merritt; S Game; O D Williams; D Blake
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Preschool vision screening: outcome of children referred to the hospital eye service.

Authors:  D K Newman; A Hitchcock; H McCarthy; J Keast-Butler; A T Moore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Emmetropization, visual acuity, and strabismus outcomes among hyperopic infants followed with partial hyperopic corrections given in accordance with dynamic retinoscopy.

Authors:  D Somer; E Karabulut; F G Cinar; U E Altiparmak; N Unlu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Prevalence of decreased visual acuity among preschool-aged children in an American urban population: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study, methods, and results.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Michael X Repka; Joanne Katz; Lydia Giordano; Josephine Ibironke; Patricia Hawes; Diane Burkom; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A new computer program for mass screening of visual defects in preschool children.

Authors:  D Briscoe; T Lifshitz; M Grotman; A Kushelevsky; H Vardi; S Weizman; B Biedner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.