Literature DB >> 6359456

Informed consent and patient decision making: two decades of research.

C L Kaufmann.   

Abstract

Patient consent to medical treatment has been a subject of concern within the United States professional communities for over two decades. This paper traces the development of research literature on patient decision making and informed consent to medical treatment in three fields of research: medicine, law and the social sciences. A general model for stages in the development of scientific specialties is applied as a test for the development of informed consent as a specialty interest in each research field. Results indicate a relatively advanced stage of development within medicine and law. Research in the social science disciplines tend to lag behind in terms of cumulative number of publications. In addition, social science research which is potentially relevant to the ethical and policy issues of consent in medical treatment appears to lack a clear programmatic thrust, with little attention given to the policy implications of the work. In contrast, the medical and legal literatures indicate a direct concern with social policy and reflect attempts on the part of physicians and lawyers to influence the policy making process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canterbury v. Spence; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6359456     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90311-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

1.  Consent in medical decision making: the role of communication.

Authors:  W C Wu; R A Pearlman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Breast cancer information: New York State.

Authors:  S Doolittle
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Invoking death: How oncologists discuss a deadly outcome.

Authors:  Alexandra Tate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Practical problems of conducting patient-satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  S C Parker; F J Kroboth
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Are we getting informed consent from patients with cancer?

Authors:  H J Sutherland; G A Lockwood; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 18.000

7.  The consent process: Enabling or disabling patients' active participation?

Authors:  Carole Doherty; Charitini Stavropoulou; Mark Nk Saunders; Tracey Brown
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2016-07-26

8.  Optimizing the HIV/AIDS informed consent process in India.

Authors:  J Sastry; H Pisal; S Sutar; N Kapadia-Kundu; A Joshi; N Suryavanshi; K E Bharucha; A Shrotri; M A Phadke; R C Bollinger; A V Shankar
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 8.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.