Literature DB >> 6357269

A randomized double-blind controlled trial of the value of stilboestrol therapy in pregnancy: long-term follow-up of mothers and their offspring.

M P Vessey, D V Fairweather, B Norman-Smith, J Buckley.   

Abstract

In the early 1950s, a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of the value of prophylactic stilboestrol therapy given antenatally to reduce the incidence of late pregnancy toxaemia and to improve perinatal mortality was conducted at University College Hospital, London. Women expecting their first baby were allocated to one or other of two groups. Those in the stilboestrol group started treatment at the 12th week of pregnancy on average and received a mean dose of about 11.5 g of the drug while those in the control group received placebo tablets. In spite of the fact that the original trial documentation was lost, it was possible to be fairly certain which was the treated group and follow-up data from 650 mothers and 660 offspring were obtained from death certificates, cancer registrations and questionnaires sent to general practitioners. We found no indication of any harmful long-term effect of stilboestrol exposure during pregnancy on the mothers--in particular 10 out of 331 women in the untreated group and 9 out of 319 women in the treated group were found to have developed breast cancer. Amongst the daughters, those in the treated group suffered an excess of minor benign lesions of the cervix uteri and an excess (not statistically significant) of unfavourable pregnancy outcomes. None of the daughters had developed clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina or cervix uteri. Amongst the sons, we discovered no evidence of any significant excess of genital tract disorders or of impaired reproductive performance in the treated group but one son developed a (fatal) teratoma of the testis. Unexpectedly, psychiatric disease (especially depression and anxiety) was reported by general practitioners about twice as often in the treated group offspring (sons and daughters) as in the untreated group. This result cannot be due to bias, and is unlikely to be due to confounding or chance, and may thus represent an adverse effect of exposure to stilboestrol in utero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6357269     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb06438.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  20 in total

1.  Diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero and depression in women.

Authors:  Eilis J O'Reilly; Fariba Mirzaei; Michele R Forman; Alberto Ascherio
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Implication of environmental estrogens on breast cancer treatment and progression.

Authors:  Thomas L Gonzalez; James M Rae; Justin A Colacino
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 3.  The history of DES, lessons to be learned.

Authors:  Marieke Veurink; Marlies Koster; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-06

Review 4.  Exogenous hormones in the aetiology of cancer in women.

Authors:  M P Vessey
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Serious psychiatric outcome of subjects prenatally exposed to diethylstilboestrol in the E3N cohort study.

Authors:  Helene Verdoux; Jacques Ropers; Dominique Costagliola; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Prenatal Diethylstilbestrol Exposure and Risk of Depression in Women and Men.

Authors:  Linda Titus; Elizabeth E Hatch; Julie R Palmer; Dezheng Huo; William C Strohsnitter; Ervin Adam; Winnie Ricker; Marianne Hyer; Robert N Hoover; Rebecca Troisi
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 7.  Animal models of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Suzanne E Fenton; David Aylor
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.690

Review 8.  Prenatal influences on temperament development: The role of environmental epigenetics.

Authors:  Maria A Gartstein; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2017-12-12

9.  Long-term effects of environmental endocrine disruptors on reproductive physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Heather B Adewale
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Praegnatio Perturbatio-Impact of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Authors:  Vasantha Padmanabhan; Wenhui Song; Muraly Puttabyatappa
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.