Literature DB >> 6356553

The improvement and quantitative assessment of B-mode images produced by an annular array/cone hybrid.

M S Patterson, F S Foster.   

Abstract

Hybrid ultrasound imaging systems, which combine spherical focusing on transmit with axicon focusing on receive, provide excellent resolution over a useful depth of field. This paper presents a new hybrid design with improved sensitivity, in which the axicon focusing is achieved by two conical mirrors and a PZT 5A disk out into 8 sectors. We have investigated two methods of processing the signals from the 8 sectors. In the first, phase insensitive sector addition (PISA), the B-scan is formed from the sum of the 8 demodulated signals. In the second, multiplicative processing (MP), the 8 rf waveforms are multiplied and the resultant is demodulated to form the image. Both techniques result in smoothed speckle but degraded lateral resolution. As well, MP decreases the off-axis sensitivity of the system and artifacts characteristic of axicon focusing. Quantitative assessment of the effects of PISA and MP was performed using a new approach called contrast-to-speckle ratio (CSR). The CSR data, which is a measure of the image contrast of cylindrical voids in a random scattering medium relative to contrast fluctuations due to speckle, shows the superiority of PISA and MP. This conclusion is supported by images of in vitro human breast tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6356553     DOI: 10.1177/016173468300500301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of guidewire path reproducibility.

Authors:  Sebastian Schafer; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Peter B Noël; Ciprian N Ionita; Jacek Dmochowski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Unsupervised clustering method to convert high-resolution magnetic resonance volumes to three-dimensional acoustic models for full-wave ultrasound simulations.

Authors:  Kevin Looby; Carl D Herickhoff; Christopher Sandino; Tao Zhang; Shreyas Vasanawala; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-07-22

3.  Lesion detectability in diagnostic ultrasound with short-lag spatial coherence imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy J Dahl; Dongwoon Hyun; Muyinatu Lediju; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  An Automated Region-Selection Method for Adaptive ALARA Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Katelyn M Flint; Emily C Barre; Matthew T Huber; Patricia J McNally; Sarah C Ellestad; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Lag-One Coherence as a Metric for Ultrasonic Image Quality.

Authors:  Will Long; Nick Bottenus; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Frequency-Dependent Spatial Coherence in Conventional and Chirp Transmissions.

Authors:  James Long; Nick Bottenus; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Histogram Matching for Visual Ultrasound Image Comparison.

Authors:  Nick Bottenus; Brett C Byram; Dongwoon Hyun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Ultrasound Lesion Detectability as a Distance Between Probability Measures.

Authors:  Dongwoon Hyun; Gene B Kim; Nick Bottenus; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Training improvements for ultrasound beamforming with deep neural networks.

Authors:  A C Luchies; B C Byram
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.174

10.  Assessing the Robustness of Frequency-Domain Ultrasound Beamforming Using Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Adam C Luchies; Brett C Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.