Literature DB >> 6352612

A randomized study of ceftazidime compared to ceftazidime and tobramycin for the treatment of infections in cancer patients.

V Fainstein, G P Bodey, L Elting, R Bolivar, M J Keating, K B McCredie, M Valdivieso.   

Abstract

Three hundred and twenty-one febrile episodes in cancer patients were treated with ceftazidime alone or in combination with tobramycin. Patients were grouped according to their neutrophil count into neutropenic and non-neutropenic (less than 1000 and greater than 1000/mm3) respectively. Two hundred and seventy-five episodes were evaluated. The overall response rate in 83 episodes of infection treated with ceftazidime alone was 60 and 73% in those who received the combination. In those bacteriologically proven the response rate was 72% in both groups of the study. The overall response rate in septicaemia was 75% with ceftazidime alone and 85% with the combination. High response rates were obtained in Gram-negative bacillary septicaemias in both groups even in neutropenic patients treated with ceftazidime alone. Pneumonias in neutropenic patients responded equally well. However, patients with adequate neutrophil counts responded better to the combination than to single-agent therapy. The response rate for Gram-positive infections was 41% for ceftazidime alone and 57% for the combination, which was inferior to the results obtained for Gram-negative infections (P = 0.001). The rates of superinfection and toxicity were very low. Ceftazidime is a useful antibiotic against Gram-negative infections in cancer patients. It should be combined with an agent active against Gram-positive pathogens in neutropenic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6352612     DOI: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_a.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  29 in total

1.  Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.

Authors:  D Kalman; S L Barriere
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Empiric treatment of infection during granulocytopenia: a comprehensive approach.

Authors:  J Klastersky
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  A randomized study of imipenem compared to cefotaxime plus piperacillin as initial therapy of infections in granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  A Böhme; G Just-Nübling; L Bergmann; P M Shah; W Stille; D Hoelzer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Evolution of the clinical manifestations of infection during the course of febrile neutropenia in patients with malignancy.

Authors:  E C Dompeling; J P Donnelly; J M Raemaekers; S C Deresinski; R Feld; B E De Pauw
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Randomized prospective study of ceftazidime versus ceftazidime plus cephalothin in empiric treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  C S Verhagen; B de Pauw; T de Witte; J Janssen; K Williams; P de Mulder; T Bothof
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Empirical antibiotic therapy in the febrile neutropenic cancer patient: clinical efficacy and impact of monotherapy.

Authors:  J W Hathorn; M Rubin; P A Pizzo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Imipenem-cilastatin as initial therapy for febrile cancer patients.

Authors:  G P Bodey; M E Alvarez; P G Jones; K V Rolston; L Steelhammer; V Fainstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Three-step empiric treatment for severely neutropenic patients with fever: ceftazidime--vancomycin--amphotericin B.

Authors:  H Koeppler; K H Pflueger; R Seitz; K Havemann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Double beta-lactam regimen compared to an aminoglycoside/beta-lactam regimen as empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J H Joshi; K A Newman; B W Brown; R S Finley; R L Ruxer; M A Moody; S C Schimpff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Gram-positive superinfections following beta-lactam chemotherapy: the significance of the enterococcus.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.