Literature DB >> 3551829

Randomized prospective study of ceftazidime versus ceftazidime plus cephalothin in empiric treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic patients.

C S Verhagen, B de Pauw, T de Witte, J Janssen, K Williams, P de Mulder, T Bothof.   

Abstract

In a prospective randomized study, ceftazidime monotherapy was compared with a combination of ceftazidime plus cephalothin in 102 febrile neutropenic patients. Thirty bacteriologically documented infections, of which 23 were bacteremias, in 48 clinically assessable patients were treated with ceftazidime alone. Twenty-four bacteriologically proven infections, of which 18 were bacteremias, in 42 clinically assessable patients were treated with a combination of ceftazidime and cephalothin. The clinical response rates in assessable patients were 77% for ceftazidime monotherapy and 88% for the combination. The bacteriological clearance rate was 70% for ceftazidime monotherapy and 79% for the combination. Efficacy against gram-negative pathogens appeared to be excellent, with 93% clearance for ceftazidime monotherapy and 100% clearance for the combination. The bacteriological clearance of gram-positive infections was only 60% for both regimens, with failures mainly due to Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus sanguis, which are primarily resistant to both ceftazidime and cephalothin. After addition of vancomycin to those infections which did not respond to empiric therapy, bacteriological clearance rates of 94% (ceftazidime plus vancomycin) and 90% (ceftazidime and cephalothin plus vancomycin) were achieved. Three superinfections were registered in the ceftazidime group and two were seen in the combination group. Other adverse effects of ceftazidime were minimal and were not enhanced by combination with cephalothin. It is concluded that ceftazidime is an effective drug for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients, especially if one is prepared to modify therapy if resistant gram-positive strains or mycotic infections are encountered. Neither the clinical nor bacteriological cure rates could be substantially improved by adding cephalothin to ceftazidime in initial empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3551829      PMCID: PMC174690          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.2.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  14 in total

1.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  G P Bodey; M Buckley; Y S Sathe; E J Freireich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Randomized study of ceftazidime versus gentamicin plus cefotaxime for infections in severe granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  B E de Pauw; F Kauw; H Muytjens; K J Williams; T Bothof
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  The role of inducible beta-lactamases in the antagonism seen with certain cephalosporin combinations.

Authors:  K P Fu; H C Neu
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Double beta-lactam therapy in the immunocompromised host.

Authors:  L S Young
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Comparative toxicities of third-generation cephalosporins.

Authors:  B R Meyers
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-08-09       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Relation of structural properties of beta-lactam antibiotics to antibacterial activity.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-08-09       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  A randomized trial comparing ceftazidime alone with combination antibiotic therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia.

Authors:  P A Pizzo; J W Hathorn; J Hiemenz; M Browne; J Commers; D Cotton; J Gress; D Longo; D Marshall; J McKnight
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A randomized study of ceftazidime compared to ceftazidime and tobramycin for the treatment of infections in cancer patients.

Authors:  V Fainstein; G P Bodey; L Elting; R Bolivar; M J Keating; K B McCredie; M Valdivieso
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Comparative activity of seven extended-spectrum cephalosporins against gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures.

Authors:  S M Norris; S H Guenthner; R P Wenzel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and economic considerations of empirical antibacterial therapy of febrile neutropenia in cancer.

Authors:  G Dranitsaris
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis of empirical therapy with ceftazidime alone or combination antibiotics for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  G Dranitsaris; T M Tran; A McGeer; L Narine
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A randomized clinical trial of ceftriaxone and teicoplanin versus ceftazidime and teicoplanin as antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients and bone marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  A A Fauser; E Lang; G Köchling; F D Daschner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Ceftazidime versus imipenem-cilastatin as initial monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients.

Authors:  R Liang; R Yung; E Chiu; P Y Chau; T K Chan; W K Lam; D Todd
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Empirical antibiotics targeting gram-positive bacteria for the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ofrat Beyar-Katz; Yaakov Dickstein; Sara Borok; Liat Vidal; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-03

6.  Three-step empiric treatment for severely neutropenic patients with fever: ceftazidime--vancomycin--amphotericin B.

Authors:  H Koeppler; K H Pflueger; R Seitz; K Havemann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Ceftazidime with or without amikacin for the empiric treatment of localized infections in febrile, granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  I R Nováková; J P Donnelly; B E de Pauw
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.673

8.  Ceftazidime versus ceftazidime plus tobramycin in febrile neutropenic children.

Authors:  R F Jacobs; T S Vats; K A Pappa; S Chaudhary; M Kletzel; D L Becton
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Ceftazidime sodium carbonate versus ceftazidime arginine as empirical monotherapy in febrile neutropenic patients.

Authors:  C Verhagen; B E De Pauw; K J Williams; W Du Bois
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Interventional antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. Study Group of the Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy.

Authors:  H Link; G Maschmeyer; P Meyer; W Hiddemann; W Stille; M Helmerking; D Adam
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.