Literature DB >> 634681

The effect of open- vs. closed-book testing on performance on a multiple-choice examination in pediatrics.

C F Schumacher, D W Butzin, L Finberg, F D Burg.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to test the effect of open- vs. closed-book testing conditions on performance on a graduate-level, multiple-choice examination in pediatrics. A group of practicing pediatricians and a group of medical students took the examination. For the practice group, no significant difference between mean scores was observed, and the correlation between scores under the two testing conditions was high. In the student group, however, the mean score was significantly higher under open-book conditions and the correlation between scores under the two testing conditions was positive but low. The mean score obtained by practitioners was significantly higher than the mean score obtained by students under both testing conditions. The effects of time limit and level of motivation were not explored in the present study.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 634681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  2 in total

1.  Are Standardized Knowledge Assessment Exams the Best Way to Assess a Pharmacist's Competence and Should They Be a Mandatory Componentof Licence Renewal?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-07

2.  Testing Effect on High-Level Cognitive Skills.

Authors:  Jamie L Jensen; Mark A McDaniel; Tyler A Kummer; Patricia D D M Godoy; Bryn St Clair
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.