Literature DB >> 6339144

Clinical experience with allograft implantation. The first ten years.

H J Mankin, S Doppelt, W Tomford.   

Abstract

Since 1971 the Orthopaedic Oncology Service at the Massachusetts General Hospital has performed 150 resections and allograft implantations for the management of mostly tumorous bone conditions. The procedures used cadaveric segments harvested from donors and stored at -80 degrees after exposure of the cartilage to 10% glycerol as a cryopreservative. Following resection of the tumor, the selected part was implanted and held with plates and screws or intramedullary rods, and the patients were observed closely for alterations suggestive of "rejection" (none was seen), presence of recurrences or metastases, functional status of the part, and relationship of complications to outcome. Of 91 patients followed up for two or more years, the grafts performed acceptably (excellent or good functional result) in 70% or more. The results were better in patients with low-grade tumors or benign conditions and in resections and transplantations that did not involve a joint. Complications were a major factor in determining outcome. In patients with skin sloughs (9 patients), infection (13.2%), and, to a lesser extent, allograft fracture (16.5%), the prognosis for retention of the graft and functional restoration was compromised, but nonunion or delayed union (11%) had little effect on end results. The program remains somewhat experimental, in that continued research is required to improve the predictability of bony revascularization and the viability of articular cartilage, and to avoid the problems associated with infection and fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6339144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  53 in total

1.  Comparison of 39 post-traumatic tibia bone transports performed with and without the use of an intramedullary rod: the long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Ulrich Wiebking; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Management of infection following reconstruction in bone tumors.

Authors:  Sudhir K Kapoor; Rajesh Thiyam
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-07

3.  Antibacterial activity of bone allografts: comparison of a new vancomycin-tethered allograft with allograft loaded with adsorbed vancomycin.

Authors:  Constantinos Ketonis; Stephanie Barr; Irving M Shapiro; Javad Parvizi; Christopher S Adams; Noreen J Hickok
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  A novel approach to juxta-articular aggressive and recurrent giant cell tumours: resection arthrodesis using bone transport over an intramedullary nail.

Authors:  S Vidyadhara; Sharath K Rao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Bone transplantation.

Authors:  L Schweiberer; H Stützle; H K Mandelkow
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Microsurgical free fibular bone transfer: a technique for reconstruction of large skeletal defects following resection of high-grade malignant tumors.

Authors:  F Schuind; F Burny; F J Lejeune
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Bone allografting: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Harish V Kurup; Prabhakar Rao; Dilip K Patro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Preliminary results of 79 massive bone allografts in the conservative treatment of malignant tumors in adults and children].

Authors:  G Delépine; N Delépine
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Long-term results for limb salvage with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Christian M Ogilvie; Eileen A Crawford; Harish S Hosalkar; Joseph J King; Richard D Lackman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Evaluation of a novel nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste Ostim in comparison to Alpha-BSM - more bone ingrowth inside the implanted material with Ostim compared to Alpha BSM.

Authors:  Franz-Xaver Huber; Nicholas McArthur; Lydia Heimann; Elvira Dingeldein; Héloïse Cavey; Xavier Palazzi; Gaëlle Clermont; Jean-Pierre Boutrand
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.