| Literature DB >> 6327296 |
F Morinet, F Ferchal, R Colimon, Y Pérol.
Abstract
The following six methods for detecting rotavirus in human faecal samples were compared: electron microscopy, immune electron microscopy, immunofluorescence in cell culture, two enzyme immunoassays (Rotazyme, Enzygnost ) and a latex agglutination test ( Rotalex ). Specimens were collected from 112 children with diarrhoea. The relative sensitivities of the different assays for human rotavirus were as follows: electron microscopy, 84%; immunofluorescence, 86%; Rotalex , 88%; Rotazyme, 89%; immune electron microscopy, 93%; Enzygnost , 98%. According to our findings Enzygnost is the most sensitive method, but Rotalex is more valuable for screening a small number of faecal samples. No false-positive results were observed in the two enzyme immunoassays or in Rotalex .Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1984 PMID: 6327296 PMCID: PMC7088116 DOI: 10.1007/bf02014331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0722-2211 Impact factor: 3.267