Literature DB >> 6308898

Predominant integration end products of infecting bacteriophage Mu DNA are simple insertions with no preference for integration of either Mu DNA strand.

G Chaconas, D L Kennedy, D Evans.   

Abstract

The integration of 32P-labeled infecting Mu DNA into the Escherichia coli chromosome was investigated. Cleavage of the integrated Mu DNA with restriction endonuclease EcoRI, which cuts twice in the Mu genome, liberated the internal EcoRI fragment but not the left and right end fragments. The ends of the Mu genome became fused with host DNA at a variety of locations generating a smear of radioactive DNA fragments following cleavage with EcoRI. The predominant integration end products of infecting Mu DNA molecules are therefore generated by a mechanism which results in simple insertions and not cointegrates. Since predominantly simple insertions are found after infection (during lysogenization or lytic growth) but not after prophage induction, the transposition mode which is utilized appears to be a function of the source of the transposing DNA. Use of the integrated, 32P-labeled Mu DNA as a hybridization probe with the separated strands of Mu DNA or lambda phages carrying various regions of Mu showed no strand preference in the integration process. Both labeled DNA strands at both ends of the Mu genome were integrated. These results suggest the lack of a site-specific recombination site in the genome; the simple insertions which are the end products of Mu DNA integration following infection appear to be generated by a separate pathway rather than by the resolution of cointegrate structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6308898     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(83)90317-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virology        ISSN: 0042-6822            Impact factor:   3.616


  9 in total

1.  Chromosomal integration mechanism of infecting mu virion DNA.

Authors:  T K Au; Pushpa Agrawal; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Controlling DNA degradation from a distance: a new role for the Mu transposition enhancer.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Rudra P Saha; Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Mu transpososome and RecBCD nuclease collaborate in the repair of simple Mu insertions.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lysogenization of Escherichia coli him+, himA, and himD hosts by bacteriophage Mu.

Authors:  R B Bourret; M S Fox
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

6.  Repair of transposable phage Mu DNA insertions begins only when the E. coli replisome collides with the transpososome.

Authors:  Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  The nucleotide sequence of the B gene of bacteriophage Mu.

Authors:  J L Miller; S K Anderson; D J Fujita; G Chaconas; D L Baldwin; R M Harshey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Characteristics of MuA transposase-catalyzed processing of model transposon end DNA hairpin substrates.

Authors:  Anna-Helena Saariaho; Harri Savilahti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution.

Authors:  Sherwin P Montaño; Ying Z Pigli; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.