Literature DB >> 630033

Are there two logistic regressions for retrospective studies?

N Breslow, W Powers.   

Abstract

A comparison is made between two different approaches to the linear logistic regression analysis of retrospective study data: the prospective model wherein the dependent variable is a dichotomous indicator of case/control status; and the retrospective model wherein the dependent variable is a binary or polychotomous classification of exposure. The two models yield increasingly similar estimates of the relative risk with increasing degrees of covariate adjustment. When the covariate effects are saturated with parameters, the relative risk estimates are identical. The prospective model is generally to be preferred for studies involving multiple quantitative risk factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 630033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Estimation and testing of the relative risk of disease in case-control studies with a set of k matched controls per case with known prevalence of disease.

Authors:  Barry Kurt Moser; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Some insights into Miettinen's multivariate confounder score approach to case-control study analysis.

Authors:  M C Pike; J Anderson; N Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Infant mortality by cause of death: main and interaction effects.

Authors:  I W Eberstein; C B Nam; R A Hummer
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1990-08

4.  Circumcision and sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  L S Cook; L A Koutsky; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Smoking and carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  J L Lyon; J W Gardner; D W West; W M Stanish; R M Hebertson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Likelihood-based methods for regression analysis with binary exposure status assessed by pooling.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Li Tang; Ji Lin; Zhiwei Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Nasal cancer in the textile and clothing industries.

Authors:  L A Brinton; W J Blot; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1985-07

8.  Impact of the 1115 behavioral health Medicaid waiver on adult Medicaid beneficiaries in New York State.

Authors:  Eric Y Frimpong; Wahida Ferdousi; Grace A Rowan; Marleen Radigan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.734

9.  Reproductive factors in the aetiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  L A Brinton; R Hoover; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Proton pump inhibitors are associated with increased risk of development of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Pradeep Arora; Anu Gupta; Mojgan Golzy; Nilang Patel; Randolph L Carter; Kabir Jalal; James W Lohr
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.388

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.