Literature DB >> 6250676

Opiate antagonist receptor binding in vivo: evidence for a new receptor binding model.

D C Perry, K B Mullis, S Oie, W Sadée.   

Abstract

The in vivo accumulation and retention of the opiate antagonist tracers [3H]diprenorphine and [3H]naloxone at cerebral opiate receptor sites in rats exceed that expected from their known in vitro receptor affinities. The [3H]diprenorphine serum and brain levels can be stimulated with a pharmacokinetic model that contains the receptors in a micro-compartment. The receptor micro-compartment consists of a population of binding sites next to a diffusion boundary which restricts ligand diffusion away from the receptor. Such an arrangement introduces a delay in the binding equilibrium of potent antagonists with the receptor sites and an increase in the apparent in vivo receptor affinity at subsaturating doses of the ligand; at saturating ligand concentrations these functions of the receptor micro-compartment are abolished. A physiological interpretation of the receptor micro-compartment could be the location of clustered opiate receptor sites on the exterior cell surface next to the synaptic cleft as the diffusion boundary. This kinetic approach involving a combination of pharmacokinetics and drug-receptor interactions permits the quantitative analysis of receptor site availability in the intact animal. Our results support the hypothesis that only one receptor population affects the in vivo disposition of the antagonist tracers, while they do not exclude the presence of low affinity binding sites that have been observed with the use of [3H]naloxone in vitro. Moreover, the binding site population observed in vivo may be responsible for mediating opiate agonist analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6250676     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90229-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  16 in total

Review 1.  Long-lasting target binding and rebinding as mechanisms to prolong in vivo drug action.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Simplified models for heterobivalent ligand binding: when are they applicable and which are the factors that affect their target residence time.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  'Partial' competition of heterobivalent ligand binding may be mistaken for allosteric interactions: a comparison of different target interaction models.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; David Hall; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Receptor-mediated transport of peptide hormones and its importance in the overall hormone disposition in the body.

Authors:  Y Sugiyama; M Hanano
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Link between a high k on for drug binding and a fast clinical action: to be or not to be?

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 6.  Exploring avidity: understanding the potential gains in functional affinity and target residence time of bivalent and heterobivalent ligands.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Effects of binge pattern cocaine administration on dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the rat brain: an in vivo study using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  H Tsukada; J Kreuter; C E Maggos; E M Unterwald; T Kakiuchi; S Nishiyama; M Futatsubashi; M J Kreek
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effects of target binding kinetics on in vivo drug efficacy: koff , kon and rebinding.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  Cell membranes… and how long drugs may exert beneficial pharmacological activity in vivo.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Theoretical effects of radioligand diffusional gradients and microscopic neuroreceptor distribution in in vivo kinetic studies.

Authors:  B R Zeeberg; R C Reid; K A Murphy; R C Reba
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.