Literature DB >> 625012

Human muscle nerve sympathetic activity at rest. Relationship to blood pressure and age.

G Sundlöf, B G Wallin.   

Abstract

1. Recordings of multi-unit sympathetic activity were made from median or peroneal muscle nerve fascicles in thirty-three healthy subjects, resting in recumbent position. Simultaneous recordings of intra-arterial blood pressure were made in seventeen subjects. The neural activity, quantified by counting the number of pulse synchronous sympathetic bursts in the mean voltage neurogram (burst incidence), was plotted against the arterial blood pressure level and the age of the subjects. The effects of spontaneous temporary blood pressure fluctuations were studied by correlating different pressure parameters of individual heart beats to the probability of occurrence of a sympathetic burst and to the amplitude of the occurring burst.2. Between different subjects there were marked differences in burst incidence, from less than 10 to more than 90 bursts/100 heart beats. No correlation was found to interindividual differences in the arterial blood pressure level but there was a slight tendency for increasing burst incidence with increasing age.3. Irrespective of the magnitude of the burst incidence, the bursts always occurred more frequently during spontaneous transient blood pressure reductions than during transient increases in blood pressure. When, for each heart cycle, the occurrence of a sympathetic burst was correlated with different blood pressure parameters there was regularly a close negative correlation to diastolic pressure, a low correlation to systolic and an intermediary negative correlation to mean blood pressure. There was a positive correlation to pulse pressure and to pulse interval.4. When measured for individual heart beats, not only the occurrence but also the mean voltage amplitude of the sympathetic bursts tended to increase with decreasing diastolic pressure.5. In a given subject when comparing heart beats with the same diastolic pressure, the occurrence as well as the amplitude of the sympathetic bursts was higher for heart beats occurring during falling than for heart beats occurring during rising blood pressure. For a given change in diastolic blood pressure, sympathetic activity changed more if pressure was falling than if it was rising.6. The findings suggest that the sympathetic outflow is modulated by arterial baroreflex mechanisms and that transient variations in the strength of the activity are, to a large extent, determined by diastolic blood pressure fluctuations. The intimate correlation with ;dynamic' variations in blood pressure and the absence of correlation to the ;static' blood pressure level suggests that the sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscles is of importance for buffering acute blood pressure changes but has little influence on the long term blood pressure level. The difference in reflex sensitivity between falling and rising pressure indicates that acute blood pressure decreases may be buffered more efficiently than acute blood pressure increases.7. In twenty-seven subjects baroreflex latency was calculated from the QRS-complexes in the e.c.g. to the appropriate systolic inhibition in the sympathetic activity. When recording in the peroneal nerve, the latency ranged between 1.16 and 1.49 sec and there was a positive correlation with the height of the subjects. It is suggested that such latency measurements may be used clinically to evaluate conduction in sympathetic fibres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 625012      PMCID: PMC1282513          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  28 in total

1.  Servoanalysis of carotid sinus reflex effects on peripheral resistance.

Authors:  A M SCHER; A C YOUNG
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1963-02       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Mechanism of the carotid sinus in experimental hypertension.

Authors:  P KEZDI
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Blood flow in the foot and calf in the elderly; a comparison with that in young adults.

Authors:  M J ALLWOOD
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 6.124

4.  Baroceptor function in chronic renal hypertension.

Authors:  J W MCCUBBIN; J H GREEN; I H PAGE
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Cardiovascular responses to various pulsatile pressures in the carotid sinus.

Authors:  R M Schmidt; M Kumada; K Sagawa
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1972-07

6.  Comparison of the reflex heart rate response to rising and falling arterial pressure in man.

Authors:  T G Pickering; B Gribbin; P Sleight
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 10.787

7.  Comparison of the reflex vasomotor responses to separate and combined stimulation of the carotid sinus and aortic arch baroreceptors by pulsatile and non-pulsatile pressures in the dog.

Authors:  J E James; M de B Daly
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The responses of aortic arch and right subclavian baroreceptors to changes of non-pulsatile pressure and their modification by hypothermia.

Authors:  J E James
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Postural effects on muscle nerve sympathetic activity in man.

Authors:  D Burke; G Sundlöf; G Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The variability of muscle nerve sympathetic activity in resting recumbent man.

Authors:  G Sundlöf; B G Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  194 in total

1.  Two sites for modulation of human sympathetic activity by arterial baroreceptors?

Authors:  P Kienbaum; T Karlssonn; Y B Sverrisdottir; M Elam; B G Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Firing properties of single vasoconstrictor neurones in human subjects with high levels of muscle sympathetic activity.

Authors:  V G Macefield; B G Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Sympathetic neural responses to 24-hour sleep deprivation in humans: sex differences.

Authors:  Jason R Carter; John J Durocher; Robert A Larson; Joseph P DellaValla; Huan Yang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  The cardiovascular system.

Authors:  A Moore; A A Mangoni; D Lyons; S H D Jackson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Age-related decline in autonomic control of blood pressure: implications for the pharmacological management of hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  Ton J Cleophas; Rob van Marum
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Skin sympathetic nerve activity component synchronizing with cardiac cycle is involved in hypovolaemic suppression of cutaneous vasodilatation in hyperthermia.

Authors:  Yoshi-ichiro Kamijo; Yoshiyuki Okada; Shigeki Ikegawa; Kazunobu Okazaki; Masaki Goto; Hiroshi Nose
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Limb-specific training affects exercise hyperemia but not sympathetic vasoconstriction.

Authors:  Gregory S Wimer; James C Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Arterial pressure oscillations are not associated with muscle sympathetic nerve activity in individuals exposed to central hypovolaemia.

Authors:  Kathy L Ryan; Caroline A Rickards; Carmen Hinojosa-Laborde; William H Cooke; Victor A Convertino
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Reflex control of circulation in the elderly.

Authors:  G Mancia; J Cléroux; A Daffonchio; A U Ferrari; C Giannattasio; G Grassi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.727

10.  Menstrual cycle effects on sympathetic neural responses to upright tilt.

Authors:  Qi Fu; Kazunobu Okazaki; Shigeki Shibata; Robin P Shook; Tiffany B VanGunday; M Melyn Galbreath; Miriam F Reelick; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.