Literature DB >> 5499528

Comparison of the reflex vasomotor responses to separate and combined stimulation of the carotid sinus and aortic arch baroreceptors by pulsatile and non-pulsatile pressures in the dog.

J E James, M de B Daly.   

Abstract

1. In the anaesthetized dog the carotid sinuses and aortic arch were isolated from the circulation and separately perfused with blood by a method which enabled the mean pressure, pulse pressure and pulse frequency to be varied independently in each vasosensory area. The systemic circulation was perfused at constant blood flow by means of a pump and the systemic venous blood was oxygenated by an extracorporeal isolated pump-perfused donor lung preparation.2. When the vasosensory areas were perfused at non-pulsatile pressures within the normal physiological range of mean pressures, the reflex reduction in systemic vascular resistance produced by a given rise in mean carotid sinus pressure was significantly greater than that resulting from the same rise of aortic arch pressure.3. On the other hand, when the vasosensory areas were perfused at normal pulsatile pressures and within the normal physiological range of mean pressures, there was no difference in the size of the reflex vascular responses elicited by the same rise in mean pressure in the carotid sinuses and in the aortic arch.4. Whereas the vasomotor responses elicited reflexly by changes in mean carotid sinus pressure are modified by alterations in pulse pressure, those evoked by the aortic arch baroreceptors through changes of mean pressure are only weakly affected by modifications in pulse pressure. Evidence for this was obtained from single stepwise changes of mean pressure in each vasosensory area during pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion, and from curves relating the mean pressure in the carotid sinuses or aortic arch and systemic arterial perfusion pressure.5. The vasomotor response elicited by combined stimulation of the carotid sinus and aortic arch baroreceptors was greater than either response resulting from their separate stimulation.6. When the mean perfusion pressures in the two vasosensory areas are changed together, the curve relating mean pressure to systemic arterial pressure during pulsatile perfusion of the areas is considerably flatter than that for non-pulsatile perfusion.7. Increasing the pulse pressure in the carotid sinuses or aortic arch caused a decrease in systemic vascular resistance, the response elicited from the carotid sinuses being the larger.8. Altering the phase angle between the pulse pressure waves in the carotid sinuses and aortic arch had no effect on systemic vascular resistance.9. In both vasosensory areas, increasing the pulse frequency caused a reduction in systemic vascular resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1970        PMID: 5499528      PMCID: PMC1395737          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  30 in total

1.  The role of parameters of pulsating pressure in the stimulation of intracarotid receptors.

Authors:  J GERO; M GEROVA
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1962-11-01

2.  Electron microscopy of elastic arteries; the thoracic aorta of the rat.

Authors:  D C PEASE; W J PAULE
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1960-06

3.  Reflex responses elicited in the cat by perfusion of the root of the right subclavian artery.

Authors:  E NEIL
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1956-03-01

4.  Pressure-circumference relations in the aorta.

Authors:  R F RUSHMER
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1955-12

5.  The central and reflex regulation of the heart rate.

Authors:  G V Anrep; H N Segall
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1926-04-23       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Chemoreceptor impulse activity following haemorrhage.

Authors:  S LANDGREN; E NEIL
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1951-08-25

7.  Summation of bilateral carotid sinus signals in the barostatic reflex.

Authors:  K Sagawa; K Watanabe
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1965-12

8.  Comparison of the reflex responses elicited by stimulation of the separately perfused carotid and aortic body chemoreceptors in the dog.

Authors:  M Daly; A Ungar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cardiac and respiratory effects of aortic arch baroreceptor stimulation.

Authors:  M N Levy; M L Ng; H Zieske
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Dynamic response characteristics of carotid sinus baroreceptors.

Authors:  J W Spickler; P Kezdi
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1967-02
View more
  32 in total

1.  The aortic arch baroreceptor response to static and dynamic stretches in an isolated aorta-depressor nerve preparation of cats in vitro.

Authors:  J O Arndt; A Dörrenhaus; H Wiecken
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Hierarchical recruitment of the sympathetic and parasympathetic limbs of the baroreflex in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Annabel E Simms; Julian F R Paton; Anthony E Pickering
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Preventable deaths after injury: why are the traditional 'vital' signs poor indicators of blood loss?

Authors:  R A Little; E Kirkman; P Driscoll; J Hanson; K Mackway-Jones
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1995-03

4.  The physiologically relevant information regarding systemic blood pressure encoded in the carotid sinus baroreceptor discharge pattern.

Authors:  J O Arndt; J Morgenstern; L Samodelov
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Increase of renal sympathetic nerve activity by metoprolol or propranolol in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  S Majcherczyk; A Mikulski; M Sjölander; P Thorén
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Short-term regulation of arterial pressure and the calculation of open-loop gain in the intact anesthetized dog.

Authors:  R Burattini; P Borgdorff; N Westerhof
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Inotropic responses of the left ventricle to changes in aortic arch pressure in anaesthetized dogs.

Authors:  R Hainsworth; F Karim
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Carotid and cardiopulmonary baroreceptor control of splanchnic and forearm vascular resistance during venous pooling in man.

Authors:  F M Abboud; D L Eckberg; U J Johannsen; A L Mark
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Renin response to stimulation of cardiopulmonary mechanoreceptors in man.

Authors:  W Kiowski; S Julius
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Effects of pulse frequency on single-unit baroreceptor activity during sine-wave and natural pulses in dogs.

Authors:  F M Abboud; M W Chapleau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.