Literature DB >> 624758

Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading.

H S Lin, Y K Liu, K H Adams.   

Abstract

Nineteen fresh, intact lumbar intervertebral joints (two vertebrae and the intervening joint) from twelve spines were loaded in a materials testing machine to determine their mechanical behavior. The loads applied were pure axial compression and complex loading conditions simulating physiological states. The measurements made included vertical load deflection, disc bulge, and strains in both the anterior and the lateral aspects of the vertebral body and in one lamina. The results showed that the posterior elements transmit considerable force during quasistatic complex loading, particularly in extension and frontal shear. When a healthy specimen is subjected to complex loading, "yielding or failure" occurs in the vertebral body and not in the annulus fibrosus of the disc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 624758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  15 in total

1.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Incorporating Six Degree-of-Freedom Intervertebral Joint Stiffness in a Lumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model-Method and Performance in Flexed Postures.

Authors:  Xiangjie Meng; Alexander G Bruno; Bo Cheng; Wenjun Wang; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  A more realistic disc herniation model incorporating compression, flexion and facet-constrained shear: a mechanical and microstructural analysis. Part I: Low rate loading.

Authors:  Kelly R Wade; Meredith L Schollum; Peter A Robertson; Ashvin Thambyah; Neil D Broom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Quantification of continuous in vivo flexion-extension kinematics and intervertebral strains.

Authors:  Tina M Nagel; Jared L Zitnay; Victor H Barocas; David J Nuckley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Measurement of range of motions of L3-L4 healthy spine through offsetting reflective markers and in silico analysis of meshed model.

Authors:  G Kosalishkwaran; S Parasuraman; D Kingsly Jeba Singh; Elango Natarajan; I Elamvazuthi; John George
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Percutaneous interbody osteosynthesis in the treatment of thoracolumbar traumatic or tumoural lesions. A review of 51 cases.

Authors:  G Lozes; A Fawaz; P Mescola; T Marnay; M Herlant; P Devos; A Cama; G O Sertl; M Brambillas Bas; X Leclercq
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Strain on the interarticular stress distribution. Measurements regarding the development of spondylolysis.

Authors:  K P Schulitz; F U Niethard
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1980

8.  The mechanical response of the neural arch of the lumbosacral vertebra and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Y Suezawa; H A Jacob; F P Bernoski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture.

Authors:  Michael N Tzermiadianos; Susan M Renner; Frank M Phillips; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Michael R Zindrick; Robert M Havey; Michael Voronov; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Biomechanical characterization of an annulus-sparing spinal disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.