Literature DB >> 31444622

Measurement of range of motions of L3-L4 healthy spine through offsetting reflective markers and in silico analysis of meshed model.

G Kosalishkwaran1, S Parasuraman2, D Kingsly Jeba Singh3, Elango Natarajan4, I Elamvazuthi5, John George6.   

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common condition in elderly population that can be painful and can significantly affect individual's quality of life. Diagnosis of DDD allows prompt corrective actions but it is challenging due to the absence of any symptoms at early stages. In studying disc degeneration, measurement of the range of motion (RoM) and loads acting on the spine are crucial factors. However, direct measurement of RoM involves increased instrumentation and risk. In this paper, an innovative method is proposed for calculating RoM, emphasizing repeatability and reliability by considering the posterior thickness of the spine. This is achieved by offsetting the position of markers in relation to the actual vertebral loci. Three geometrically identical finite element models of L3-L4 are developed from a CT scan with different types of elements, and thereafter, mesh element-related metrics are provided for the assessment of the quality of models. The model with the best mesh quality is used for further analysis, where RoM are within ranges as reported in literature and in vivo experiment results. Various kinds of stresses acting on individual components including facet joints are analysed for normal and abnormal loading conditions. The results showed that the stresses in abnormal load conditions for all components including cortical (76.67 MPa), cancellous (69.18 MPa), annulus (6.30 MPa) and nucleus (0.343 MPa) are significantly greater as compared to normal loads (49.96 MPa, 44.2 MPa, 4.28 MPa and 0.23 MPa respectively). However, stress levels for both conditions are within safe limits (167-215 MPa for cortical, 46 MPa for the annulus and 3 MPa for facets). The results obtained could be used as a baseline motion and stresses of healthy subjects based on their respective lifestyles, which could benefit clinicians to suggest corrective actions for those affected by DDD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Biomedical image processing; In silico; Kinematics; Kinesis; Lumbar spine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31444622     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02026-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  28 in total

1.  Reliability and Comparison of Spinal End-Range Motion Assessment Using a Skin-Surface Device in Participants With and Without Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Jason Zafereo; Sharon Wang-Price; Jace Brown; Evan Carson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 2.  Biomechanics of back pain.

Authors:  Michael A Adams
Journal:  Acupunct Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Guilhem Denozière; David N Ku
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Finite element modeling mesh quality, energy balance and validation methods: a review with recommendations associated with the modeling of bone tissue.

Authors:  Timothy A Burkhart; David M Andrews; Cynthia E Dunning
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Biomechanical Effects of the Geometry of Ball-and-Socket Artificial Disc on Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Jisoo Choi; Dong-Ah Shin; Sohee Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Three-dimensional x-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Pearcy; I Portek; J Shepherd
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Geometric sensitivity of patient-specific finite element models of the spine to variability in user-selected anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  J P Little; C J Adam
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography.

Authors:  M J Pearcy; S B Tibrewal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effect of kyphoplasty parameters on the dynamic load transfer within the lumbar spine considering the response of a bio-realistic spine segment.

Authors:  Alexander Tsouknidas; Savvas Savvakis; Yiannis Asaniotis; Kleovoulos Anagnostidis; Antonios Lontos; Nikolaos Michailidis
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical modelling of the facet joints: a review of methods and validation processes in finite element analysis.

Authors:  Marlène Mengoni
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-11-22

2.  Role of the Anterior Center-Edge Angle on Acetabular Stress Distribution in Borderline Development Dysplastic of Hip Determined by Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Songhao Chen; Liqiang Zhang; Yuqian Mei; Hong Zhang; Yongcheng Hu; Duanduan Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.