Literature DB >> 6244076

The effects of long-term ingestion of asbestos on the colon of F344 rats.

K J Donham, J W Berg, L A Will, J R Leininger.   

Abstract

Weanling F344 rats, which were fed a diet containing 10% chrysotile (B), were studied over their life-time to determine the effects of ingested asbestos on the colon. Control groups consisted of rats fed a diet containing a 10% nonnutritive cellulose or a standard laboratory rat diet. The pathological findings in the colons of 501 rats (189 on asbestos diet, 197 on fiber control diet, and 115 on standard control diet), are reported here. Epithelial tumors of the colon (eight adenocarcinomas and one adenoma) were found in nine of the rats on study. Four of the tumors were in asbestos-fed rats, two tumors were found in the non-nutritive cellulose controls, and three tumors were found in the standard laboratory rat diet controls. The probability (based on actuarial analysis) of developing adenoma or adenocarcinomas during the 32 months of the study were 7.4% for the asbestos-fed group, 3.5% for the fiber control diet and 4.0% on the standard control diet. In addition, one malignant mesothelioma of the type induced by intraperitoneally administered asbestos was found in the asbestos-fed group. Non-neoplastic lesions of the colon were also evaluated. The cumulative risk for development of any colon-associated lesion (non-neoplastic plus neoplastic lesions) was greatest for asbestos-fed rats (17.9%), compared to 13.6% for those fed the fiber control diet and 8.2% for those fed the standard control diet. The colon tissue levels of adenosine, 3'-5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) were significantly lower in the animals fed asbestos compared to the control diets. Chrysotile fibers were seen by electronmicroscopy (e.m.) in six of ten ashed colon specimens of rats fed the asbestos diet. Although the differences in numbers of tumors between the animals fed asbestos and the controls were not statistically significant at the 5% level, we felt that the combination of observations including 1) evidence of increased probability of asbestos-fed animals to develop colon lesions in general; 2) evidence of a special type of mesothelioma in rats fed asbestos; 3) evidence for a cell regulator defect (lowered cAMP levels) in colon tissues of animals fed asbestos; and 4) evidence for asbestos fiber penetration of the colonic mucosa (e.m. studies) suggest that ingested asbestos is not inert in the colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6244076     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800315)45:5+<1073::aid-cncr2820451308>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

Review 1.  Does asbestos exposure cause gastrointestinal cancer?

Authors:  D S Levine
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Chrysotile asbestos in kidney cortex of chronically gavaged rats.

Authors:  K J Patel-Mandlik; J R Millette
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Asbestos-Induced Gastrointestinal Cancer: An Update.

Authors:  Seok Jo Kim; David Williams; Paul Cheresh; David W Kamp
Journal:  J Gastrointest Dig Syst       Date:  2013-09-10

4.  Possibility of inducing glandular stomach cancer in rats exposed to asbestos.

Authors:  F M Kogan; N N Vanchugova; V N Frasch
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1987-10

Review 5.  Nonpulmonary outcomes of asbestos exposure.

Authors:  Melisa Bunderson-Schelvan; Jean C Pfau; Robert Crouch; Andrij Holian
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 6.  Review of published studies of orally administered asbestos.

Authors:  L W Condie
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Review of published studies on gut penetration by ingested asbestos fibers.

Authors:  P M Cook
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Asbestos penetration of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  W H Hallenbeck
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Chronic effects of dietary exposure to amosite and chrysotile asbestos in Syrian golden hamsters.

Authors:  E E McConnell; A M Shefner; J H Rust; J A Moore
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Prostate Cancer and Asbestos: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Frédéric Dutheil; Laetitia Zaragoza-Civale; Bruno Pereira; Martial Mermillod; Julien S Baker; Jeannot Schmidt; Fares Moustafa; Valentin Navel
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.