Literature DB >> 6242733

A retrieval account of the long-term modality effect.

A M Glenberg.   

Abstract

When to-be-remembered (TBR) word pairs are separated by distractor activity, recall of the last few audibly presented pairs is greater than recall of the last few visually presented pairs. The effect is found even after a considerably long distractor-filled retention interval. Five experiments disconfirm echoic storage, short-term storage and long-term storage accounts of these effects, as well as demonstrating that the effect is not an artifact of differential use of a recency-first output strategy. The data are generally consistent with the proposition that retrieval is disrupted by modality-specific similarity between to-be-remembered items and distractor information.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6242733     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  21 in total

1.  Spatial frequencies in short-term memory for faces: a test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses.

Authors:  M J Wenger; J T Townsend
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

2.  A recency-based account of the list length effect in free recall.

Authors:  Geoff Ward
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

Review 3.  Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  István Winkler; Susan Denham; Robert Mill; Tamás M Bohm; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.

Authors:  C G Penney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

5.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.

Authors:  Lance C Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

6.  Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the serial nature of recall and the effect of test expectancy.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatarah; Geoff Ward; Lydia Tan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

7.  Ineffectiveness of visual distinctiveness in enhancing immediate recall.

Authors:  J McDowd; S Madigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

Review 8.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

9.  Exploring long-term modality effects: vocalization leads to best retention.

Authors:  S E Gathercole; M A Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-03

Review 10.  A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.