Fusimotor reflexes in triceps surae muscle elicited by extension of the contralateral hind limb in the cat.

Experiments were performed in thirty-two cats anaesthetized with chloralose. The aim of the study was to investigate the reflex effects of flexion or extension of the contralateral hind limb on ipsilateral fusimotor neurones, to compare these effects with the effects elicited by stretch of the ipsilateral posterior biceps and semitendinosus (p.b.s.t.) muscles (Appelberg, Hulliger, Johansson & Sojka, 1982) and to clarify the interactions between the reflexes elicited from the ipsilateral and the contralateral side. Activity in fusimotor neurones was studied indirectly by recording from primary and secondary muscle spindle afferents of the triceps surae muscle. The mean rate of firing and the modulation of the afferent response to sinusoidal extension of the triceps surae was determined. Control measurements were made with the ipsilateral p.b.s.t. muscles relaxed and the contralateral hind limb in resting position. Tests were made with stretch of the ipsilateral p.b.s.t. and/or extension/flexion of the contralateral hind limb. With extension of the contralateral hind limb 64 out of 210 primary afferents (30.5%) showed predominantly dynamic reflexes (41 out of 134 in spinalized preparations: 30.6%), 25 (11.9%) showed mixed or predominantly static effects (1 spinalized: 0.7%), 121 (57.6%) showed no effect (92 spinalized: 68.7%). Flexion of the limb gave, with only two exceptions, no observable effect. Thirty-three secondary afferents were investigated. Five responded to extension of the contralateral hind limb with excitatory reflex effects. Flexion did not influence the secondary afferents. Mostly the reflex effects were not accompanied by detectable electromyogram (e.m.g.) activity in the ipsilateral triceps (surface recordings), indicating that the reflexes mainly involved gamma-motoneurones. A comparison was made between the reflexes elicited by stretch of the ipsilateral p.b.s.t. and extension of the contralateral hind limb. The percentage of responsive units was higher for the contralateral stimulus. Spinalization almost abolished the statis reflex responses to both ipsi- and contralateral stimulation, and it increased the number of dynamic responses to ipsilateral stimulation. The ipsilaterally elicited reflexes also seemed more dependent upon background activity. Ipsilateral stimulus could facilitate or reduce a contralaterally evoked response, even when the ipsilateral stimulus alone gave no effect. The reflexes could also summate. Quite often combined stimuli changed the character of the reflex from dynamic to static or vice versa.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)