Literature DB >> 6237143

Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

H Dash, D M Leaman.   

Abstract

Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as compared with that during routine coronary angiography is unknown. Therefore, cumulative radiation exposure at operator eye level was measured in two physicians (operators 1 and 2) during performance of coronary angioplasty and routine coronary angiography. The physicians participated together during angioplasty in eight patients; they performed routine angiography separately in eight patients each. Cumulative radiation exposure for eight angioplasty procedures was 140 mrads for operator 1 and 130 mrads for operator 2. In contrast, exposure during eight routine angiograms was 80 mrads for operator 1 and 60 mrads for operator 2. Mean cineangiographic time per case was similar (p = NS) during angioplasty (44.1 +/- 14.0 seconds for both operators) and angiography (49.7 +/- 6.1 seconds for operator 1, 47.6 +/- 16.1 seconds for operator 2). In contrast, fluoroscopy time was longer (p less than 0.01) for angioplasty (34.5 +/- 17.7 min) compared with angiography (13.1 +/- 5.1 min for operator 1, 13.7 +/- 8.2 min for operator 2). Thus, operator radiation exposure during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was, on average, 93% greater than during routine coronary angiography and was related to the duration of fluoroscopy rather than cineangiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6237143     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80398-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  Sex proportion of offspring and exposure to radiation in male invasive cardiologists.

Authors:  James W Choi; Praveen Mehrotra; Lee A Macdonald; Lloyd W Klein; Norm M Linsky; Anne M Smith; Mark J Ricciardi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2007-07

Review 2.  Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology.

Authors:  E Kuon; J Birkel; M Schmitt; J B Dahm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Radiation hazards for cardiologists.

Authors:  M J Raphael; N E Tomlinson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-05

5.  Radiation hazards to the cardiologist. A report of a subcommittee of the British Cardiac Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-11

6.  Pattern and degree of radiation exposure during endovascular surgery performed using a mobile C-arm or in a hybrid room.

Authors:  Cheng Quan; Sang Su Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Procedural determinants of fluoroscopy time in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Syed Fayaz Mujtaba; Tahir Saghir; Jawaid Akbar Sial; Nadeem Hassan Rizvi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantos; Georgios Patatoukas; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.